Your post doesn’t make any sense. Ooops, sorry.
How can you imply that Perry would make an unstable candidate when his entire life and political history has been stable and consistent?
And when you are left with two candidates who are just weird in so many ways.
Oh, don’t get me wrong, I will support Newt if it comes to that and Santorum if I have to, but Perry is the one with the right ideas, the right record.
I think Perry felt he’d given his all in Iowa and did have to stop and think about his path.
If you think there’s something wrong with that, okay, but I don’t.
He decided that quitting after one caucus was not fair to him or his supporters and decided to continue.
He never announced he was out.
Obviously the loyalty of Perry’s supporters annoys you, but it’s what we feel.
Who is your candidate?
“Your post doesn’t make any sense. Ooops, sorry.
How can you imply that Perry would make an unstable candidate when his entire life and political history has been stable and consistent?”
Did you even read this part?
“I DO have a real issue with a candidate that almost immediately bombed out of the gate, had to then partially disappear from the race to “retool” himself to yet continue to bomb. Then to hear boasting from his supporters about his big comeback only to finish poorly in Iowa, where he then vanish (His word “reasses”) from the race for 24 hours (Most of his staff thought he was out) to then announce that he ins’t out but will now stay in!”
If you think that what I said is some sort of off the wall nonsense, then you haven’t been paying attention because this is what the consensus of most people on this site is in regards to Perry. Oops, sorry if we all arent smoking the happy Perry grass, but he has not made a good run, period.
I dont care what his record is, almost everyone up there has said the “right” things. It is his run that has been lousy.
All of the loyalty in the world wont hide this.
And btw, I haven’t made a secret of my support of Newt.