To: Kaslin
Obviously, they are going to require accepting the insurance as a condition of licensure. But, since running the office costs more than the state will pay, kulaks independent physicians will be crushed, naturally with a simultaneous propaganda campaign to demonize them as greedy incompetent frauds. Once the real doctors are out of the way, the rest (rationing, death panels, special hospitals for party members, etc) will be a breeze.
7 posted on
01/07/2012 5:57:34 AM PST by
Jim Noble
("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
To: Jim Noble
Why do we want to exchange a medical system where not everyone has medical insurance, but everyone gets medical care, for a system where everyone has medical insurance but not everyone gets medical care? What nonsense.
45 posted on
01/07/2012 7:41:44 AM PST by
The Old Commander
(Where is Madam dufarge when we need her?)
To: Jim Noble
The future of healthcare under obama care is already in sight in some areas--you won't be seeing doctors anymore--you will be seeing "physician extenders" like nurse practitioners and physician assistants.
To: Jim Noble
Obviously, they are going to require accepting the insurance as a condition of licensure. But, since running the office costs more than the state will pay, kulaks independent physicians will be crushed, naturally with a simultaneous propaganda campaign to demonize them as greedy incompetent frauds. Once the real doctors are out of the way, the rest (rationing, death panels, special hospitals for party members, etc) will be a breeze.\
BTTT
69 posted on
01/08/2012 11:59:23 AM PST by
Finny
("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson