Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PetroChina Buys Oil-Sands Project
Wall Street Journal ^ | EDWARD WELSCH

Posted on 01/06/2012 8:12:42 PM PST by Olog-hai

CALGARY—Athabasca Oil Sands Corp. said it was selling a 40% stake in one of its oil-sands prospects to PetroChina Co., a move that for the first time will give full ownership of such a project to a Chinese company.

Athabasca is selling its remaining interest in the MacKay River project in northern Alberta to PetroChina for C$680 million, or US$666 million. In 2010, Athabasca sold 60% stakes in MacKay and a separate development, Dover, to PetroChina for C$1.9 billion. …

Canada holds the world's third-largest reserves of oil. Most of those are oil-sands—essentially a mix of bitumen and quartz sand—located in the western Canadian province of Alberta. Oil-sands output has grown quickly, and Alberta and Canadian officials have sought out new markets.

That has particularly been the case after the U.S. State Department late last year delayed a decision on a pipeline proposed to carry oil from Alberta to the U.S. Gulf Coast.

The government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said it would actively market its oil to Asian buyers, including China. The Canadian government has said it backs the construction of another pipeline running from Alberta to the Pacific, where oil could be loaded onto tankers bound for Asia. …

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; china; oilsands
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
I guess this is Harper's abandonment of conservatism. Even in spite of the spat between his government and Obama, this should never have happened.
1 posted on 01/06/2012 8:12:52 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If the U.S. doesn’t want the oil from the oil sands (you did have first refusal), why shouldn’t Canada sell it to a willing buyer? In what way is this even remotely an abandonment of conservatism?


2 posted on 01/06/2012 8:18:07 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Selling to one’s enemy is an abandonment of conservatism. China regards all non-communists as enemy territory to be taken over by any means. They’re certainly happy about a wedge being between Canada and the USA, which makes such things easier for them; now Canada is being exploited by China just like the Congo is.


3 posted on 01/06/2012 8:25:06 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Are you proposing we close down the international stock market??? How dumb, we owe china trillions and you think a stock transaction for a little bitty company for a 40% share is something.


4 posted on 01/06/2012 8:29:15 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I HOPE they CHANGE their mind. FUBHO!


5 posted on 01/06/2012 8:34:21 PM PST by REDWOOD99 ("Everyone should pay taxes. Everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99
Change their minds, you mean take the company private. Ok. That would be expensive, but the Chinese investors would make a ton.
6 posted on 01/06/2012 8:42:05 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Yet one more success for the Comrade In Chief!


7 posted on 01/06/2012 8:44:42 PM PST by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
My ass. This is Obama 's abandonment of the West including the United States.

this should never have happened.

Sorry Swee'Pea. "should" ain't "is."

8 posted on 01/06/2012 8:47:19 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

So you’re saying that China is part of “the West”?


9 posted on 01/06/2012 8:50:20 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Someone is deeply confused here, the first sell to china was in 2010. What does that have to do with the current pipe line. And what percentage of the oil fields does this company control.


10 posted on 01/06/2012 8:56:15 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The Canadian government has said it backs the construction of another pipeline running from Alberta to the Pacific, where oil could be loaded onto tankers bound for Asia. …

I wonder if BC will have a say in this pipeline? If Gasoline is over $4 by election day and we aren't going to have our pipeline this will defeat Obama.

11 posted on 01/06/2012 9:19:31 PM PST by Mike Darancette (11/06/2012: Starts "Occupy the White House")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
You don't sell stategic assets to enemy countries. And Obama isn't America.
Some of us stand up for Canada, despite the lunacy of your leftists and purported conservative administrations. Nice to see the favor repaid by you.
12 posted on 01/06/2012 9:21:49 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Money talks, BS walks. No abandonment of conservatism, it’s embracing it. The Chinese want to pay money for a pipeline we won’t build, then fine, take the money.


13 posted on 01/06/2012 9:43:33 PM PST by henkster (Obama regime mission statement: "Find the people working, and stop them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster
WADR, whoredom is not conservative, nor is Mammon-worship. You do have to draw the line somewhere, and that line should include not selling out to enemies.
14 posted on 01/06/2012 9:48:02 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Canadians would have been perfectly happy to sell it to us. We refused. They’ve spent money to get a product ready to bring to market. So you expect their businessmen to take a loss out of...what? Dislike of the Chinese? Some sort of “higher moral purpose?”

I don’t know what planet you live on but that doesn’t happen on mine. That’s why our industry left for China. We taxed, regulated, sued and unionized it out of the country. Either the company moves or sells to the Chinese, or goes out of business to the company that does. You may not like it, but that’s the way the world has always worked and always will.


15 posted on 01/06/2012 10:08:55 PM PST by henkster (Obama regime mission statement: "Find the people working, and stop them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

How does it feel to live in a destroyed country fellow American’s?


16 posted on 01/06/2012 10:09:28 PM PST by Captain7seas (FIRE JANE LUBCHENCO FROM NOAA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

Dang oil is a world wide commodity, the chinese will buy it where they can get it the cheapest including transpportation. Currently they are getting deep discounts from iran. Buying the canadian company stock is just another business investment, and has nothing to do with the pipe line since the first purchase was in 2010.


17 posted on 01/06/2012 10:22:14 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: henkster

Well stated.

I can’t help but wonder if this backfired on the Big O. Maybe he thought by putting off a decision, he could retain the union AND green vote.

Sadly, we will all suffer for his incompetence.


18 posted on 01/06/2012 10:50:07 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

To quote a Star Trek character I once read in a book:

“Klingons are ruthless, vindictive and savage bastards but on the other hand, they pay their bills on time and in full. By Ferengi standards, we can accept such idiosyncrasies so long as there’s profit to be made.”

Rule of acquisition 21: “Never place friendship before profit”


19 posted on 01/06/2012 11:35:51 PM PST by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

That’s fine. When Russia starts flexing their muscles in the Arctic (Hello Losmonov Ridge), and Canada is looking for someone to support their claim, maybe they can call China?


20 posted on 01/06/2012 11:38:49 PM PST by steel_resolve (Ships With Holes Will Sink And I Will Swim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson