Replies

If you imagine in your wildest imagination that the GOP can win a national election with a despicable and totally unprincipled weathervane like child of privilege Willard "Mitt" Romney who is rightfully despised by principled social conservatives, gun rights conservatives, military conservatives, foreign policy interventionists and most of the rest of the actual coalition that makes up the actually conservative base of voters in this nation, I am afraid we will be agreeing to disagree. I and a lot of others will not be caught dead or alive voting for the Mittwit, paleoPaulie or Huntsman and none of them will be elected, If the GOP wants to oust Obozo it had better nominate a genuinely conservative candidate and not the trust fund baby, the crackpot or Obozo's ambassador to China. Each offers absolutely nothing worth voting for.

I gather that you are a careful quiet supporter of the Mittwit. As an alternative to Obozo, any old trash will do so long as it is socially revolutionary trash, right? If you are not a pro-abort (not "pro-choice" since there is no such thing but pro-abort), not a trust fund baby, not Mittens' brother-in-law and have no polo ponies, why ever would you even consider supporting a brainless twit like Mitt?

AND, you are whining about "big government." Can you imagine Mitt Romney being anything but a privileged updated successor of Hubert Humphrey? Humphrey had the wrong principles but at least he was principled. The Mittwit would spend his time cowering in the corner lest those who run leftist cocktail parties in DC not approve him, lest he not be viewed as "enlightened," lest he be viewed as an "extremist!!!," lest he be mistaken for the unwashed who in his ideological twin's words "a bitter clinger holding on to his Bible and his guns." So, he won't personally wow 'em in San FranSicko but he would definitely send 'em the message that they want to hear.

Walker and Johnson made no bones about the fact that they were candidates who were religious and social conservatives. I listen to Wisconsin radio out of Milwaukee: i.e., Charlie Sykes until he caved to the faux and hallucinated inevitability of the Mittwit, and I live about six miles south of the Cheddar Curtain. I was also a Reagan state chairman in a northeastern state when he bucked feckless social revolutionary Gerald Ford in 1976. You weren't. Ford got beaten by Carter. Reagan won 40 states against Carter in 1980 and 49 against Mondale in 1984. Phony social conservative George Herbert Walker Bush who was Reagan's Veep beat Dukakis but once the general public got a good look at moderate fiscal Republicanism in action (including reading his lips and watching him raise taxes) the public vomited him out of office. Dole (tax collector for the welfare state) had his empty head handed to him in 1996 while de-emphasizing social issues (and attending the same social revolutionary Foundry Methodist Church in DC as Billy Jeff and Hitlery). Dubya emphasized his social conservatism and was elected twice. McCain took the spineless route and was defeated by Obozo.

There used to be those who said that communism did not fail in the Soviet Union and elsewhere but rather had never been tried. In a similar vein spineless money-obsessive Republican apparatchiks will say that Impeached Nixon, Defeated Ford, Defeated Bush the Elder (and Defeated Romney the Elder and Nelson Rockefeller and William Scranton and others for that matter), Dole and other spineless money obsessive social revolutionary or invertebrate intimidated moderates had not really discredited their breed but simply had never actually TRIED spineless moderation or social issue surrender, so we should now nominate "Son of Brainwashed" to PROVE that spineless social issue moderation and GOP liberalism in general can too succeed if only it is tried properly. Then, after Mittens is destroyed in 2012, if it appears that we will still have elections in 2016, they can try to nominate (and inevitably lose again with) Huntsman or Olympia Snowe or Susan Collins or Bob Corker or John Cornyn or LAMAR!!! or Lisa Moocowski or some other brainless twit to prove that the trust fund babies without principles can too win no matter what the unwashed may imagine.

If you happen to be a libertoonian for paleoPaulie, try and make an honest man of him again and make him run on the Libertoonian Party ticket. The Libertoonians will appreciate his cowardly isolationism, his refusal to defend marriage or the babies, his hallucinations about 9/11 and his pals at Stormfront. Of course, he will be back to 1% as he was in 1988 but, as a Libertoonian, he should agree not to trespass on Republican property. Halloween was over months ago and he is a bit long in the tooth to be trick or treating in a Republican costume.

You never said you WEREN'T "pro-choice" either. Trust fund babies like Muffy and Skipper hanging out at the Snobbington Polo Club can probably get you a great deal on polo ponies. So can Muffy's pals down at the Junior League.

If you believe that "moderation" is a winner, I can get you a great buy on a bridge that connects Brooklyn to Manhattan (cash only, small unmarked bills and you get a quit claim deed only) but you can get rich setting up a toll booth!!!

I am every bit as Tea Party as you may claim to be and I know better than to view the Tea Party as soulless unprincipled babykilling, lavender coddling, gun grabbing money obsessives.

One last thing. If you are ever tempted to include me an any group that you would call "we" or "us," don't. There is no we or us that includes thee and me.