Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives: Time to rally around a not-Romney
Associated Press ^ | Jan 5, 5:08 PM EST | LAURIE KELLMAN

Posted on 01/05/2012 2:27:02 PM PST by Hunton Peck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: GonzoGOP; Antoninus; Lazlo in PA
One of the other posters suggested Santorum/Gingrich with Newt playing the Dick Chaney roll. Rick can motivate, explain, and promote the new agenda. Newt can kick tail on Capital hill and the talk shows to be sure the agenda gets through a hopefully GOP run House and Senate.

That's the single best idea I've heard so far this election season. Love it!

21 posted on 01/05/2012 2:46:52 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

For Santorum I would not have to hold my nose to vote. Not so for Newt or Perry.

But I would vote for any of the three over Obama.


22 posted on 01/05/2012 2:48:36 PM PST by Grunthor (Mitt better than Obama? Give me three examples.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
The article has been considerably lengthened since the first posting, so I figure that means more of it can be posted:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Prominent conservative leaders want their rank and file to quickly get behind a single presidential candidate, fearful that persistent splits will help Mitt Romney win the Republican nomination.

The former Massachusetts governor narrowly won the Iowa caucuses when conservative voters divided their support among several challengers, and the worry is that the same thing will happen in South Carolina, Florida and beyond if Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry all stay in the race.

"Conservatives are still divided among a number of different candidates, but the field is winnowing," said former Republican presidential candidate Gary Bauer. And, he said: "I certainly think that Senator Santorum is in a good position to inherit a lot of that support."

In the afterglow of Santorum's unexpectedly narrow loss to Romney in Iowa, leaders on the right who have been scarcely engaged in the rollicking Republican contest began buzzing about the prospect of endorsing the former Pennsylvania senator with the solid conservative credentials - or someone else such as Gingrich who has deep conservative roots.

To discuss how to proceed, some of those leaders have set up meetings from Washington to Texas before the Jan. 21 South Carolina primary.That vote could prove pivotal, given that the Republicans who have won the state for decades have eventually become the party's nominees.

"There is movement, even members of Congress who are weighing this now who are looking to make a move," said Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, who said he's spoken with more than eight leaders with conservative constituencies, including lawmakers. He declined to name them but added: "I do think you'll see growing momentum toward Rick Santorum."

Indeed, interviews with a number of leaders, many of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to be candid, indicated that Santorum was...

[story continues]
23 posted on 01/05/2012 2:52:54 PM PST by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

I’m pulling for Nasty Newt to get as Nasty as he can get.

It will help Santorum. Go Postal Nasty Newt.


24 posted on 01/05/2012 2:54:07 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

At this point its Santorum or nuthin for me.


25 posted on 01/05/2012 2:54:55 PM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

Basically we’re going to have to drop one in South Carolina - either Newt, Perry, or Santorum. That’s going to leave around 55-60% of the vote between them. It’s the only way to beat Romney and Paul.


26 posted on 01/05/2012 2:57:41 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Agreed.
Perry should positively speak up for a favored candidate, one who has a shot.

RR rule number one?
Never speak ill?
Newt the historian missed the memo.

We all want the fire directed at Mr Zero?
Right? Bring it to the White House people.
That is the universal motivator, the path to our hearts.

Instigating infighting,politics of personal destruction is the modern standard, patented Clintonian,and now system wide Big D method. Never mind the issues.

Feeds the media exactly what it wants.
Stupid.
It has become personal for the eternally, mercilessly ugly Newt. He does not care about collateral damage.
The amateur hour emotionalism proves him unworthy.


27 posted on 01/05/2012 3:00:11 PM PST by pending (TODAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

I think it needs to be asked.

How is Santorum wimping out and letting Newt take on Romney going to help him?

I wouldn’t vote for the guy that is trying to squeak by on some other persons offensive drive. Unless people on our side abhor a candidate going on offense then I cant see Newt going on offense helping anyone but Newt, because in the end the winner will have to face Obama, and being Mr. Squeaked isnt going to be effective against a pseudo dictator.


28 posted on 01/05/2012 3:00:11 PM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Agreed.
Perry should positively speak up for a favored candidate, one who has a shot.

RR rule number one?
Never speak ill?
Newt the historian missed the memo.

We all want the fire directed at Mr Zero?
Right? Bring it to the White House people.
That is the universal motivator, the path to our hearts.

Instigating infighting,politics of personal destruction is the modern standard, patented Clintonian,and now system wide Big D method. Never mind the issues.

Feeds the media exactly what it wants.
Stupid.
It has become personal for the eternally, mercilessly ugly Newt. He does not care about collateral damage.
The amateur hour emotionalism proves him unworthy.


29 posted on 01/05/2012 3:01:06 PM PST by pending (TODAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Because one has the reputations of going postal and getting Nancy on the couch, and the other one does not. Simple enough.
30 posted on 01/05/2012 3:05:57 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

We all will vote for the person we feel is the best.
There is great disagreement here, just as there is in the
nation about who to rally around.

I’m sure when this process is over, we will all support the
GOP nominee.


31 posted on 01/05/2012 3:19:52 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

This article is jumping the gun.

We’ve had one caucus and one candidate has since dropped out.

Over the next four weeks there will be primaries or caucuses in four more states.

The process is working as it should. Those who win votes and attract donations will go forward and those who do not will drop out. It will all happen quickly and naturally.

Time will tell if Santorum has staying power, if Perry can get up off the mat, and if Newt goes up or down.

The time to worry about rallying behind a single non-Romney candidate is still six to eight weeks away.


32 posted on 01/05/2012 3:20:32 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy

not the mama


33 posted on 01/05/2012 3:22:01 PM PST by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
We may not get a real feel for this election before SuperTuesday early in March.

After it, we should see about 3 emerge in strong positions. Numbers 4 and 5 would probably drop out soon thereafter.

The big problem the Elite wing has is Romney. If Romney cannot get more than the 20-some he has been getting for months, he is in deep trouble.

Full Primary/Caucus Calendar

January 3, 2012 Iowa (caucus) – Results
January 10, 2012 New Hampshire (primary)
January 21, 2012 South Carolina (primary)
January 31, 2012 Florida (primary)
February 4, 2012 Nevada (caucus)
February 4–11, 2012 Maine (caucus)
February 7, 2012 Colorado (caucus)
Minnesota (caucus)
Missouri (primary) – *See note below on Missouri
February 28, 2012 Arizona (primary)
Michigan (primary)
March 3, 2012 Washington (caucus)
March 6, 2012
(Super Tuesday)
Alaska (caucus)
Georgia (primary)
Idaho (caucus)
Massachusetts (primary)
North Dakota (caucus)
Ohio (primary)
Oklahoma (primary)
Tennessee (primary)
Vermont (primary)
Virginia (primary)
March 6-10, 2012 Wyoming (caucus)
March 10, 2012 Kansas (caucus)
U.S. Virgin Islands (caucus)
March 13, 2012 Alabama (primary)
Hawaii (caucus)
Mississippi (primary)
March 17, 2012 Missouri (GOP caucus) – *See note below on Missouri
March 20, 2012 Illinois (primary)
March 24, 2012 Louisiana (primary)
April 3, 2012 District of Columbia (primary)
Maryland (primary)
Wisconsin (primary)
Texas (primary)
April 24, 2012 Connecticut (primary)
Delaware (primary)
New York (primary)
Pennsylvania (primary)
Rhode Island (primary)
May 8, 2012 Indiana (primary)
North Carolina (primary)
West Virginia (primary)
May 15, 2012 Nebraska (primary)
Oregon (primary)
May 22, 2012 Arkansas (primary)
Kentucky (primary)
June 5, 2012 California (primary)
Montana (primary)
New Jersey (primary)
New Mexico (primary)
South Dakota (primary)
June 26, 2012 Utah (primary)

==

*Missouri: Missouri will hold a primary on February 7th, 2012, which will not count for delegates toward the 2012 GOP convention. The Missouri Republican Party will hold a caucus on March 17th, 2012, which will determine the delegates sent to the 2012 GOP convention – See report from CNN

34 posted on 01/05/2012 3:44:40 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Santorum and Romney will be so milquetoast that it will make me sick. Trump surged to popularity because he called BO out for what he is. He didn’t say “he’s a nice guy ...but” a la Romney. I want Newt because he WILL call out BO. He’s the only one I see that will do it. Another Mr. Nice Guy will get the most nasty man in the country and his wife reelected.


35 posted on 01/05/2012 3:59:25 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Nasty Newt to take it to BO— the most nasty of all.


36 posted on 01/05/2012 4:02:21 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

I disagree.
Santorum will finish ahead of Newt in NH, will get a couple of Big Evangelical Endoresments, very soon, and will down south with some BIG MO.. and money.


37 posted on 01/05/2012 4:06:29 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz; All
The petulant and whiny Rick "I, I, I, me, me, me" Santorum should quit. He acted as Romney's stalking horse across the debate season, maybe auditioning for the 2nd stop.

He's a big gov't, establishment neocon lawyer with no executive experience. With his legend-in-his-own-mind prowess of vanquishing incumbent Democrats, if Santorum wanted to do some good he would try to get his Senate seat back from rat Casey.

38 posted on 01/05/2012 5:15:53 PM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: livius
If people want to know a lot more about Santorum, here is a 74 minute, 142MB .mp3 wide ranging audio interview of him by the Quad City Times from Dec. 30th. It starts out with Santorum talking about how he was doing things in Iowa, but includes long stretches of him talking not just about what he did in Congress, but why and how he did it there.

You rarely hear people talking about behind the scenes stuff there in this detail. I was fascinated by it and suspect there are others here who would enjoy it. Santorum did play a significant role in several of the good congressional actions back around Newt's golden age. Those who like Newt in part because of his ability to get things done, but don't know much about Santorum may find this useful in evaluating what Santorum might do, how he'd go about it and whether you believe he'd succeed. By all means use your own judgement. BTW, be warned that the audio quality is serviceable, not perfect. Sometimes it gets pretty soft and once you could hear a train passing outside.

If you like this it appears to be part of a series. They also have audio interviews with Perry (12/21/11), Gingrich (12/19/11), Romney, Bachmann (12/8/11) and Pawlenty (7/25/11). I haven't yet listened to any but Santorum's but will be downloading more to listen to when I find the time.

39 posted on 01/05/2012 5:38:51 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

And santorum endorsed Arlen Spector and was earmark king while in congress..... Just as bad as sitting on a couch with Nancy...


40 posted on 01/05/2012 6:16:07 PM PST by neverbluffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson