I have had issues with all three men. And willingly admit I have expressed those issues often on FR.
But take a moment and think - our choices are stark - Mitt, Paul, or Perry, Newt or Santorum. And compare the three anti-Romneys to Obama. Cripes, it is a no-brainer. Perry at least has shown he is pro-life, pro-gun, pro-business and understands the 10th. Santorum is pro-life and pro-business and largely is conservative. Newt is pro-life and cripes, he led the last EFFECTIVE conservative revolution in DC - effective meaning the real power to carry out changes such as welfare reform.
You cannot make the case how any of those three would not be a significant improvement over Obama or Romney or Paul. So please, with all due respect, make the case as to which man is the best of the three.
Romney is a non-stater as is Newt, albeit for different reasons.
Paul is certifiably insane.
Huntsman seems like a nice guy but Cain has more chance of getting elected and he's not even in the race.
So I am all in for Santorum. I could have voted for him or Bachmann prior to Tuesday night. She is out and he is doing well -- so he has my support and sincere hope that he does well. Should he not, God help us.