Posted on 01/04/2012 4:58:23 PM PST by SJackson
For the first time since the end of World War II, classic anti-Semitic tropesthe Jews control the world and are to blame for everything that goes wrong, including the financial crisis; The Jews killed Christian children in order to use the blood to bake Matzo; the Holocaust never happenedare becoming acceptable and legitimate subjects for academic and political discussion. To understand why these absurd and reprehensible views, once reserved for the racist fringes of academia and politics, are now moving closer to the mainstream, consider the attitudes of two men, one an academic, the other a politician, toward those who express or endorse such bigotry. The academic is Professor Brian Leiter. The politician is Ron Paul.
Youve probably never heard of Leiter. Hes a relatively obscure professor of jurisprudence, who is trying to elevate his profile by publishing a gossipy blog about law school professors. He is a colleague of John Mearsheimer, a prominent and world famous professor at the University of Chicago.
Several months ago Mearsheimer enthusiastically endorsed a book, really a pamphlet, that included all the classic anti-Semitic tropes. It was entitled The Wandering Who and written by Gilad Atzmon, a British version of David Duke, who plays the saxophone and has no academic connections. Atzmon writes that we must take very seriously the claim that the Jewish people are trying to control the world. He calls the recent credit crunch the Zio punch. He says the Holocaust narrative doesnt make historical sense and expresses doubt that Auschwitz was a death camp. He invites students to accept the accusations of Jews making Matzo out of young Goyims blood.
Books and pamphlets of this sort are written every day by obscure anti-Semites and published by disreputable presses that specialize in this kind of garbage. No one ever takes notice, except for neo-Nazis around the world who welcome any additions to the literature of hate.
What is remarkable about the publication of this hateful piece of anti-Semitic trash, is that it was enthusiastically endorsed by two prominent American professors, John Mearsheimer and Richard Falk, who urged readers, including students, to read, reflect upon and discuss widely the themes of Atzmons book. Never before has any such book received the imprimatur of such established academics.
I was not shocked by these endorsements, because I knew that both of these academics had previously crossed red lines, separating legitimate criticism of Israel from subtle anti-Semitism. Mearsheimer has accused American Jews of dual loyalty, and Falk has repeatedly compared Israel to Nazi Germany. Both were so enthusiastic about Atzmons anti-Zionismhe has written that Israel is worse than the Nazisthat they were prepared to give him a pass on his classic blood libel anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial. No great surprise there.
What was surprisingindeed shockingwas the fact that Mearsheimers relatively apolitical colleague, Brian Leiter, rushed to Mearsheimers defense. Without bothering even to read Atzmons book, Leiter pronounced that Atzmons positions [do not mark him] as an anti-Semite [but rather as] cosmopolitan. Leiter also certified that Atzmon does not deny the Holocaust or the gas chambers. Had Leiter read the book, he could not have made either statement.
Atzmon himself credits a man who was an anti-Semite for many of [his] insights and calls himself a self-hating Jew who has contempt for the Jew in me. If thats not an admission of anti-Semitism, rather than cosmopolitanism, I dont know what is. As far as the Holocaust is concerned, Atzmon asserts that it is not an historical narrative. And as to the gas chambers, he doubts that the Nazis ran a death factory in Auschwitz-Berkanau.
Leiter went so far as to condemn those who dared to criticize Mearsheimer for endorsing Atzmons book, calling their criticism hysterical and not advance[ing] honest intellectual discourse. And he defended Mearsheimers endorsement as straight forward.
The Brian Leiters of the world are an important part of the reason why anti-Semitic tropes are creeping back to legitimacy in academia. His knee-jerk defense of an admitted Jew haterwho, according to Leiter is not a despicable anti-Semite but an acceptable cosmopolitancontributes to the legitimization of anti-Semitism.
The same can be said of Ron Paul, who everyone has heard of. Paul has, according to The New York Times, refused to disavow the support of white supremacists, survivalists and anti-Zionists who have rallied behind his candidacy. (These anti-Zionists believe that ZionistsJewscontrol the world, were responsible for the bombing of the Oklahoma federal building, and caused the economic downturn, because most of the leaders involved in the federal and international banking system are Jews.) He allowed his Ron Paul survival report to espouse David Duke type racism and anti-Semitism for years during the 1990s, claiming he was unaware that they were being promoted under his name. Edward H. Crane, the founder of the libertarian CATO Institute, has said, I wish Ron would condemn those fringe things that float around his campaign, but he refuses to reject the support of these anti-Semites who form a significant part of his base. The New York Times has criticized Paul for his failure to convincingly repudiate racist remarks that were published under his name for yearsor the enthusiastic support he is getting from racist groups, including those that espouse anti-Semitism and far right paranoia.
Even now, Paul continues to accept contributions from Holocaust deniers, from those who blame the Jews for everything and from other bigots, thus lending some degree of legitimacy to their hateful views.
It has been said that all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Leiter and Paul may or may not be good men, but they are guilty of more than merely doing nothing. They are, by their actions, helping to legitimate the oldest of bigotries. Shame on them!
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com
URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/01/04/why-anti-semitism-is-moving-toward-the-mainstream/
Search Hitler, Nazis, etc. on youtube and read some of the comments. Very scary.
It’s a unspoken plank of the liberal platform.
I know Dershowitz is not popular around these parts, but he is spot-on here. Thanks for posting this.
What is the problem? The White House endorses the MB and that is one of their main themes. Its consistent with the modern day anti American cacaphony from the pResident’s office!
Check out a site called Zero Hedge. Posts on this blog are regularly posted on FR. While ZH primarily addresses economic issues, but you would be amazed at the anti-semetic sentiment on that site. Many definitely believe a Jewish cabal runs the world. It especially comes out when posters go out of their way to defend Iran and demonize Israel. Its really stunning.
Strange, however, that the most prominent cause, the "M" word, is not even mentioned.
While i might happen to agree with Dershbagowitz about this topic, I remember a little book he wrote about His Slickness and the effort to hold him accountable. The book was called “Sexual McCarthyism”. He wanted to excuse all of BJ Clinton’s indescretions.
I also remember a famous row he got into with Joe DiGenova. DiGenova cleaned his clock.
Dershbagowitz is a smarmy little bast@rd and I don’t have much respect for him.
I’ve never understood the hatred of Jews. Yet I hear it from people I know. People will believe anything and never stop to think for themselves or look at facts.
There are so few Jews in the world in comparison to almost any other race. They’ve been victims of genocide and murder through their whole history. They can’t hide long enough to form a secret cabal. What people might want to ask instead is who stands to benefit by using the Jewish people as a straw man to hide their own activities behind.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Paul and his followers are the face of modern anti-Semitism and they are every bit as dangerous as anti-Semites of the past.
The Messiah is a Jew. I’d really like to hear so called Christians that hate Jews explain themselves to Him.
Ironic how the American Jews who have been in the forefront of the liberal movement are becoming its victims
Sad situation for a race that has have given the world so much in the field of medicine and science is now being demonized by those who have added nothing
That is a bald-faced lie, though I won’t hold my breath awaiting your apology. Also, since you’d lie about this, your overall credibility is utterly destroyed, as far as I am concerned.
What that WRong Paul and his followers are anti-Semites? Has you ideological master disavowed the Stormfront money yet?
though I wont hold my breath awaiting your apology.
On the contrary, I'd like to reaffirm my position.
I knew this thread would be flooded with Paulbots trying to do damage control.
Also, since youd lie about this, your overall credibility is utterly destroyed, as far as I am concerned.
Now I WILL apologize, I am terribly sorry if I mistakenly gave the impression that I give a damn what the Paulbots think of me.
Read the article at the link: http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/west-of-eden/ron-paul-tells-haaretz-i-am-not-an-anti-semite-1.404208
So, Paul gives an interview in which he claims he is not an anti-Semite and that means we should disregard all evidence to the contrary?
Has it occurred to you that NO OTHER CANDIDATE has needed to given an interview denying anti-Semitism and the reason for that is that they don't have a history of anti-Semitism.
I am curious, has he actually written that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.