Posted on 01/03/2012 9:16:08 PM PST by Nachum
This clip, taken from C-Span, from a House session dating back to March 2001, shows Ron Paul stating there is nothing to fear from a global currency.... as long as it's backed by gold, of course. Listen at 0.32 (more in your face numerology), where Paul states there being nothing to fear from a "single, worldwide currency." He then goes on to praise the wonders of globalism, which he also claims is nothing to fear.
Is the establishment running scared of Ron Paul, or is that what "they" would like you to think? Is it so absurd to think they could be promoting Ron Paul while simultaneously "ignoring" and "attacking" him, thus giving him a sort of legitimacy in the eyes of a targeted vector in the never-ending dialectic scheme of mass media mind control?
What if abolishing the Fed has been in the plans all along, only to be replaced with something ever bigger and more nefarious?
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
How does owning gold and being able to use it to buy things from anyone anywhere in the world mean that you're submitting to the UN? You're not making any sense.
what part of global currency are you having so much trouble with
FDR made the gut shot in 1931 and let it writhe in agony, until LBJ finally made the head shot in 1968.
"... Ron Paul stating there is nothing to fear from a global currency.... as long as it's backed by gold, of course."
if its a global currency how long do you think it will stay backed by gold? If its global someone is controlling it and making decisions, who are those people? By definition a global currency isn’t going to be focused on US interests.
Yet one more example of how loose his grip on reality is.
When you buy stock in Coca-Cola, you don't ask how long a share of Coca-Cola stock will be backed by the profits of the Coca-Cola Corporation. Likewise, you're not forced to buy their stock. The same considerations would apply to any issuer of a gold-backed currency.
You're assuming that people would necessarily be forced into using some hypothetical gold-backed global currency. The only reason the US government needs to force us to use the US dollar, and punish people who offer alternatives, is because there's NOTHING backing up the US dollar except a pile of IOUs held by the Fed. The same is not true of gold.
Constitutionalist.
No, he said a gold backed global currency. He’s a soros backed globalist. Pretty simple
He’s not a globalist, except for the fact that he acknowledges the fact that we live in a global economy.
“except for the fact that he acknowledges the fact that we live in a global economy.”
Really? I’ve always heard him push isolationism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.