And PS...I’m not a Paul supporter by any stretch, but those who think all Paulbots are dope smoking idiots better think again. Your gross generalizations may be funny in your mind but I think you are wrong. There aren’t that many dope smokers in Iowa to give him those poll numbers.
I also find it humerous that a bunch of people who spend lots of time checking out FR are making fun of Paulbots for spending lots of time on the computer.
And before you ask...I’m voting for ANYONE but Obama.
I’ve never denied that Paul has a broad coalition of drug users, anti-Semites, racists, 911-truthers, anti-war hippies, anarchists, Occupy Wall Streeters, Democrats, leftists, etc.
I've met my share of Paultards, they're with out a doubt a strange group.
I never said all and there are exceptions to every rule.
Why so defensive?
I happen to think Paul is right on a couple of things economic, his stances otherwise are completely maniacal and dangerous, not to mention indefensible.
The difference is Paul has a large contingent of younger, techie almost cult-like followers who understand how to do things like delete cookies and write macros to spam vote in polls like this. In general, most folks on FR are simply not going to be as good at that sort of thing as kids on 4chan or reddit. For a lot of these younger people, supporting Ron Paul is sort of part of their online rebellion.
Yet Ron Paul came in third yesterday in Iowa. Romney also won, but barely. The guy to watch is Rick.