Obama is a human being too.
And so was Osama Bin Laden.
Both of them were even sentient.
Having a child at age 48 with the very high risk of Trisomy 18 is beyond foolish and stupid. More like hubris and arrogance.
I won’t even dignify your anti-life musings with a response.
[Having a child at age 48 with the very high risk of Trisomy 18 is beyond foolish and stupid. More like hubris and arrogance.]
Except Palin was 43 when she got pregnant (maybe 44). So you are a careless liar by 4 to 5 years. And I guess you would have preferred an abortion.
955 posted on Tuesday, January 03, 2012 9:56:44 PM by Aroostook25: “Having a child at age 48 with the very high risk of Trisomy 18 is beyond foolish and stupid. More like hubris and arrogance.”
What would you recommend be done with a Trisomy 18 child? Abortion? Since you’ve said a lot of stuff about Santorum on this thread tonight I think it’s time to call you out and ask where you stand.
Have you forgotten that the Santorums are Roman Catholic and unlike many Roman Catholics they take church teachings on birth control seriously? For them, “having a child” is not their decision but God’s decision. You may disagree, and that’s fine if you’re not Roman Catholic, but I will not tell someone that they ought to act contrary to the tenets of their faith.
For the record I am not Roman Catholic. I have strong objections to Roman Catholic doctrine on much more serious issues than birth control. However, there is no way I am going to criticize someone for practicing what their church preaches. If you don’t agree with your church, get out, but as long as you’re a member in good standing, do what the church teaches or at least keep quiet about your difficulties or different sentiments rather than claiming to be a loyal church member while publically attacking the church and its teachings.