Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Daffynition

Hey Newt, here’s another angle of attack on Romney.

There’s all this uproar around the country, in particular within the conservative movement, about the government picking winners and losers, and how the govt. should get out of that business.

Newt needs to remind the public that Romney’s company Bain capital is in the business of picking winners and losers. Do we really want him bringing that arrogant mentality to the White House?

NOPE!


21 posted on 01/03/2012 7:23:33 AM PST by wilco200 (11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wilco200

Bain capital is in the business of risking its own money on a bet that a given company will be a winner. That’s a far sight different than using taxpayer money, IMO.

I’m more of a mind that the Romneycare issue should be front and center - with appreciative statements from Obamacare architects front and center in the ads.


50 posted on 01/03/2012 9:44:49 AM PST by MortMan (Americans are a people increasingly separated by our connectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: wilco200

Romney’s experience with Bain Capital has absolutely zero to do with the presidency. The president is NOT a corporate CEO and America is NOT a venture, er, vulture capital company. And Bain was not even a big company. It produced nothing, had no big payroll or budget. It does not directly apply.

Newt’s highly successful experience as congressman and Speaker of the House, and with the Reagan Revolution of the 80’s and the Republican Revolution of the 90’s is vastly superior to Mitt’s limited experience at Bain. When it comes to working with the congress in cutting taxes, cutting government spending, cutting the deficit, cutting regulations, balancing the federal budget, repealing or blocking socialized healthcare programs, reforming welfare, etc, Newt has done it and is determined to do it again and even more so. Mitt has done the exact opposite. In fact, Mitt is the architect of ObamaCare!!

Mitt’s government experience saddled his state with socialized healthcare, $50.00 taxpayer funded abortion, gay marriage, liberal activist judges, banned guns, busted budgets, and an all but destroyed Republican label.

Newt’s plan is a radical reduction in the size and scope of government and a drastic reduction in government spending, taxing and regulations, and he’s determined to take the activist judiciary head-on. Mitt’s plan simply trims around the edges and leaves big government and the activist judiciary intact.

Newt is a tea party rebel. Mitt is a big government guy.

And their records of actual accomplishments in government prove it.

My only regret is that our conservative candidates did not point all of this out in a big way from day one. I guarantee you that if Romney get’s the nomination, Obama will expose the real truth about liberal Romney and his many failures as governor of Massachusetts from the get go.

And it’s all documented in living technicolor and wraparound sound straight from Romney’s big liberal lying mouth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7OQoBxZZPqU


55 posted on 01/03/2012 12:02:07 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson