Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sheikdetailfeather

Wrong Mark:

“...Candidates were officially informed of the 15,000 rule in October 2011, well in advance of the Dec. 22 submission deadline.”
http://www.rpv.org/node/1037
That was right after the RPV was sued for not validating signatures.

No evil plan, just bad luck for those who were hoping to evade the law.
I don’t think Perry and Gingrich were planning on breaking the law myself.


15 posted on 01/03/2012 6:48:51 AM PST by mrsmith (Start electing a 'Tea Party' House Speaker in 2012 now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: holdonnow

Wrong Mark:

“...Candidates were officially informed of the 15,000 rule in October 2011, well in advance of the Dec. 22 submission deadline.”
http://www.rpv.org/node/1037
That was right after the RPV was sued for not validating signatures.

No evil plan, just bad luck for those who were hoping to evade the law.
I don’t think Perry and Gingrich were planning on breaking the law myself...

(Sigh, the great Freepers get well-deserved success and then disappear!)


20 posted on 01/03/2012 9:13:15 AM PST by mrsmith (Start electing a 'Tea Party' House Speaker in 2012 now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith

not planning, but Gingrich has said publicly that his campaign had 1500 forged signatures from one of their paid “collectors”, and that was their problem. Hard to blame the RPV for rejecting forged signatures.


22 posted on 01/03/2012 9:26:02 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson