To: Jim Robinson; Stillwaters
This is a very good read. If it’s true that Michael Reagan is going to endorse Gingrich within the next couple of days, I wonder why he waited until after Iowa? I don’t know if it would have helped Newt in Iowa, but it certainly might have.
7 posted on
01/03/2012 12:47:35 AM PST by
lonevoice
(Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much. We will much about that be committed.)
To: lonevoice
Unless I'm mis-remembering (which I have been known to do), I am pretty sure Michael Reagan already endorsed Gingrich. It just didn't get much play in the media — obviously because it would help Gingrich if it got reported widely!
I'll do a FR search and see if I can find the article.
38 posted on
01/03/2012 8:28:48 AM PST by
BagCamAddict
(OMG = Obama Must Go. Let's stay focused on the goal.)
To: lonevoice
40 posted on
01/03/2012 8:32:45 AM PST by
BagCamAddict
(OMG = Obama Must Go. Let's stay focused on the goal.)
To: lonevoice
4 days ago Michael Reagan said Michael Reagan also endorsed Gingrich by describing Gingrich as a man who fought in Congress for my fathers programs. Reagan, to Newsmax, said that though millions of dollars have been spent in negative ads against him, voters should remember that Newt became a leading ally of my father by helping Congress push through massive tax cuts and working to secure a military buildup that helped defeat the Soviet Union. Newsmax Michael Reagan say the 2012 presidential election is crucial to Americas future and Newt Gingrich is the candidate who will best continue the Reagan legacy.
46 posted on
01/03/2012 9:21:45 AM PST by
tallyhoe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson