Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx

Romney is the least conservative candidate who CAN’T WIN. He does not energize the conservative base. The TEA Partiers loath him. So do the pro-lifers. Country Club Republicans are merely willing to accept him, not to man the balustrades for him. If you can’t energize the base, you can’t interest independents, and you can’t even excite the opposition into going psychotic over you, having a Wellstone moment. Then it becomes a contest between who is the least interesting/more infuriating to voters as a whole. This is a losing formula, depending on low voter turnout to achieve victory. Romney. Cannot. Win. He stands for nothing and will fall for anything, and he’ll be up against a charismatic, pathologically narcissistic demagogue of the very worst kind. Does anyone remember who ran against Hitler? Might as well be Romney. He’s a great also-ran.


14 posted on 01/03/2012 2:49:51 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Diplomacy is war by other means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Eleutheria5
Excerpting:
He stands for nothing and will fall for anything, and he’ll be up against a charismatic, pathologically narcissistic demagogue of the very worst kind. Does anyone remember who ran against Hitler? Might as well be Romney. He’s a great also-ran.

I agree with your every word! Romney is the epitome of an empty suit. Romney is a liar, but Obama is a skilled liar.

53 posted on 01/03/2012 1:20:14 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson