Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CainConservative

While these numbers seem encouraging for Santorum, I just went through the “List of Endorsements” for each candidate on Wikipedia.org. No one has any significant number of endorsements to speak of except Romney. Even Judge Bork is for Romney! Paul also has a surprisingly large number of endorsements but mostly from non-elected officials. Phyllis Schlafly is for Bachmann; none of the few for Santorum is well known.


4 posted on 01/01/2012 8:26:17 PM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for Santorum if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Theodore R.
Well if Wikipedia doesn't give Santorum any love, I guess we should just surrender and give the nomination to Romney.

(sarcasm)

6 posted on 01/01/2012 8:29:06 PM PST by airborne (Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

Well then, Willard’s endorsements better get themselves to the caucusus Tuesday night.

Because their guy is in HUGE danger of losing to Santorum.

Yes, Santorum!


7 posted on 01/01/2012 8:30:14 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Bolton, Santorum, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson