Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

The new oil field booms seem to have a large critical mass behind them, and OPEC thus far isn’t moving to undercut them, something which killed past U.S. oil booms. It remains to be seen if OPEC would keep that same attitude if instead of Obama, a Republican — even Mitt — became president. But also, since these new booms pretty much depend on fracking, they are politically vulnerable. One fracking site, out of thousands, was suspected of getting oil into shallow aquifers. And the greenies are going ape crap over it, when such a low incidence problem if it’s even real (and not a coincidence of a local toxic materials spill) would probably be best addressed by piping in fresh water subsidized by the fracking companies.


33 posted on 01/01/2012 4:45:00 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
Off the thread topic, but at best it's a boomlet, not a boom. The government, ours, doesn't want a boom or domestic energy. But that will change in time, we do have the reserves. It would be nice it they were used while I'm alive, but if it's the grandkids, or great grandkids, maybe they'll think of me when they tell the Arabs to Foff.

Another President, the solution to unemployment is in the mirror. Energy, domestic, coal, gas, oil. Dare I mention the financial sector or healthcare. All these evil people, and they're the employers. Go figure Mr. President.

41 posted on 01/01/2012 4:58:02 PM PST by SJackson (Ron Paul people are closer and closer to our talking points with each election, L Hourican Code Pink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson