Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ripley

Yes, and $2 for phone payments doesn’t seem out of line. I think I have to pay that for several of the bills I have, if I choose to pay that way instead of electronically or sending a check. What the heck? Why shouldn’t they charge that? I think it’s more an issue of silly, short-sighted, anti-”corporatism” than anything else.


26 posted on 01/01/2012 8:02:24 AM PST by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: SuzyQue
“Yes, and $2 for phone payments doesn’t seem out of line.”

Well then you are perfectly free to send an extra $2 to anyone you like. I, on the other hand will not ignore an ill advised imposition of a surcharge based on how I elect to pay my bill.
For one thing, I have a contract and have been a verizon customer for well over 10 years. While I could very easily pay my bill through my bank and avoid the fee, I view my bill on-line and pay it through their web site for convenience.

For them to tack a transaction fee on is changing the terms of service in the middle of my contract, even if they legally are able to do so, it doesn't play well with me.

40 posted on 01/01/2012 9:15:47 AM PST by bitterohiogunclinger (Proudly casting a heavy carbon footprint as I clean my guns ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson