the personal identifying information is limitless..totally demanding..had several friends actually cry about it..they were devastated.
Eric Holder is a crook, thug, jerk, and many more titles I would like to bestow upon him...and his side kick Hussein...or maybe I should say Hussein and his side kick..which ever fits.
Yes, but having worked in the past for Subsidized Housing (Section 8) I can tell you that non-caucasians get “rubber stamped” into these programs. The case worker/examiner is far more likely to “overlook” any missing information with a non-caucasian client than with whites. In fact, usually they put whites through 100 flaming hoops just to deny them on a technicality.
These case examiners don’t want any ‘trouble’ from community organizers or negative publicity in the lamestream media. I personally was told, upon finding massive fraud, to “turn my head, look the other way and keep those checks rolling” and “we don’t get administrative fees for cutting people off the program.” Even though there was a waiting list a mile long (mostly miscreants but a few people that actually DID need the help but who you knew WOULD be turned down for being 5 cents over the income limit.
I’ve seen non-caucasians come in wearing work IDs from what were the “big three” (kodak, xerox, bauch & lomb) back in the early nineties who would claim they were unemployed (although union workers making $20 an hour to turn a screw) and the case worker would just “turn her head and look the other way”
Not to go off topic but anectdotally, I have a bi-racial son and a caucasian daughter(all grown now; productive citizens, son going off to serve in the Air Force tomorrow) and for a few months I qualified for “reduced rate” school lunches for them both. Same income; same household. My daughter’s app would IMMEDIATELY be questioned and audited, whereas my son’s NEVER EVER came into question.
I asked the school officials why this was; they had no answer but just stuttered in Obama-like fashion.