Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C. Ordered to Pay $1M in Historic Gun Case
Foxnews ^

Posted on 12/29/2011 6:00:06 PM PST by Red in Blue PA

WASHINGTON – The District of Columbia has been ordered to pay more than $1 million in attorneys' fees as a result of a historic gun case that was ultimately decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Dick Heller sued the city in 2003 over its ban on handgun ownership and the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the ban in June 2008, saying it violated the Second Amendment.

A federal judge on Thursday issued an opinion awarding Heller's attorneys $1,137,072.27 in fees and expenses. The attorneys had argued they should be awarded $3.1 million. Attorneys for the city said the figure should be closer to $840,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
About time cities suffer the consequences for trampling on the 2A!
1 posted on 12/29/2011 6:00:07 PM PST by Red in Blue PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Justice!

Thank you George W. Bush.


2 posted on 12/29/2011 6:03:07 PM PST by Vision ("Did I not say to you that if you would believe, you would see the glory of God?" John 11:40)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

He and the Second Amendment Foundation deserve a lot more, in addition to our gratitude.


3 posted on 12/29/2011 6:16:38 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<0> - - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

BTT. This is the consequence of the liberal government attitude “we’ll do whatever we want, Constitutional or not, and even when the Supreme Court says we can’t, we’ll do it anyway.” It ought to come out of the pockets of the pols who abuse their offices this way, IMHO.


4 posted on 12/29/2011 6:17:41 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Now if someone could be successful doing the same to Chicago.


5 posted on 12/29/2011 6:20:36 PM PST by 2111USMC (Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

6 posted on 12/29/2011 6:26:32 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC
Now if someone could be successful doing the same to Chicago.

And NYC.
7 posted on 12/29/2011 6:39:13 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: basil

8 posted on 12/29/2011 6:43:36 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

The decision was far from unanimous....which makes me think the SCOTUS should be screened for reading impairment.


9 posted on 12/29/2011 6:43:55 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Yes,best news I heard the whole day! When they gonna sue NYC for vialation of 2ND ammendment, can hardly wait? To all the people in free states,FL,AZ,PA,etc.. you just don’t realize the life in NYC commie hell whole: BB guns are even illegal,knifes are illegal, you have to apply and wait months to get a 5-Shot shotgun and you can only keep at at home. All you guys with AR15’s, AK47’s sitting there on thousands rounds of ammo: we can only have like 200 rounds at home. You can forget of carrying a gun on your person. And no its not easy to move, when you have a job here, friends, home,etc.. When the 2ND amendment organization will finally liberate this town from liberal tyranny.


10 posted on 12/29/2011 6:55:13 PM PST by alex2011
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alex2011

NYC needs to be next.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2826395/posts?page=1

NRA, what say you?


11 posted on 12/29/2011 6:59:27 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: 2111USMC

Makes more sense to me.

The so-called legal system and justice system have failed miserably thus far.


13 posted on 12/29/2011 7:08:57 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
Nor was it a clarification of a 'right'. The Supreme Court merely allowed the commons to use a gun for self defense in a home.
14 posted on 12/29/2011 8:15:19 PM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Yeah, to bad it’s the taxpayers who get stuck with the bill.

What a perfect racket the government is, pass unconstitutional laws and then defend them with taxpayers money.


15 posted on 12/30/2011 4:52:03 PM PST by thatjoeguy (MAYDAY! MAYDAY! We are so going in ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thatjoeguy

If those taxpayers elect people who ignore the Constitution, they deserve whatever they get.


16 posted on 12/30/2011 6:35:59 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson