Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokeyblue
It's like between this topic and the amnesty issue these candidates are trying to lose voters.

Amnesty, sure, but do you really think swing voters out there are interested in these NBC theories?

Anybody who is won't vote for Obama, but most of the country doesn't care. Get outside the bubble for a while.

It's just so disingenuous.

What is? Your theory? Even in 1789, it was a dubious reading of the Constitution, and it's even less credible today. No court is going to throw out the results of a presidential election, especially when another election is right around the corner.

246 posted on 12/31/2011 10:43:46 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: x
No court is going to throw out the results of a presidential election, especially when another election is right around the corner.

And that is the nail being hit upon the head. This is not about what is true, it is about people not wanting to deal with an issue because they frankly don't want to be bothered with the trouble it would cause.

248 posted on 12/31/2011 1:11:09 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Think "the dog that did not bark.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

To: x

“No court is going to throw out the results of a presidential election, especially when another election is right around the corner.”

Oh good. Cuz, that’s what I’m paying for. I like my Supreme Court ignore the Constitution. Evade, ignore, enable. Whatever.

I like it when a usurper can illegally seat two new justices that we will all have to live with until they die. I look forward to more illegalities and more cowardess from that bunch. Especially, when one of those illegally seated justices (Kagan) was involved in corrupting the process in which NBC cases were attempting to be heard at the Supreme Court. I also enjoyed her fine work regarding Obama-scare (another unconsititutional effort). It’s nice to be the fox watching the hen house.

I like my representatives to call me a kook for asking that they follow the law. I guess being called a “birther” isn’t all that bad. It could be worse, they could call me a “teabagger.”

I like it when a usurper can just disregard Congress and write executive orders. Who needs checks and balances. It’s so archaic.

By the way got Kinetic Military Action?

I like it when a usurper can take over a private car company and award dealerships to political friends (Democrats).

As of 2008 we officially became a banana republic. We are no longer a nation of laws. We are a nation of men; particularly politically correct men, and protected classes. The antithesis of the Consitituion.

The military caved to the usurper. The courts caved to the usurper. The congress caved to the usurper.

You realize that every safeguard here failed, don’t you?

But that’s ok because now Rubio, Jindal, or Schwarzenegger can be president.

And you might be right. Maybe I gave Newt too much credit, maybe he doesn’t know what NATURAL BORN CITIZEN means. I don’t accept your premise that “even in 1789, it was a dubious reading of the Constitution.”

I feel very comfortable that were it you and I presenting our cases before the founding fathers who they would side with and I could almost guarentee you that it’s wouldn’t be with those supporting the Indonesian-Kenyan with the fake birth certificate(s).

You are a frog in a pot that is enjoying the heat. It’s scalding hot. If the actions of the past four years haven’t alerted you then I don’t know what else to say to you.

Maybe someone can think of a derogatory name for those who want the usurper to be held accountable for Fast and Furious.


250 posted on 12/31/2011 6:32:45 PM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson