Skip to comments.
Second Look: Rick Santorum Attracting Larger Crowds in Iowa
Associated Press ^
| December 28, 2011
| Thomas Beaumont
Posted on 12/28/2011 9:28:41 AM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
While Santorum's profile in Congress as a social-issues crusader bought him entree with influential evangelical conservatives in Iowa, it's his unhesitating attack on liberals that seems to be fueling his rise in internal polls by rival campaigns.
''Let's look at colleges and universities,'' Santorum said in the ballroom of the restored Frank Lloyd Wright Park Inn Hotel on Mason City's town square. ''They've become indoctrination centers for the left. Should we be subsidizing that?''
Santorum tossed out Harvard University's motto, ''Veritas,'' Latin for truth. ''They haven't seen truth at Harvard in 100 years.''
Go Rick!
Join the fight: www.ricksantorum.com
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
Though a bit prone to hysteria, I like and respect Santorum, and would prefer him over Romney, Newt or Paul.
I still believe Perry is the best of the remaining bunch, but I would be content with a Santorum candidacy.
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
“He's the only candidate in this race I trust,” said Chuck Laudner, a veteran Iowa GOP operative who introduced Santorum to more than 100 party activists on Santorum’s fourth trip to Mason City. “And he's a fighter.”
A candidate I can trust and a fighter. And also a record as a solid conservative.
That's good enough for me.
4
posted on
12/28/2011 9:43:50 AM PST
by
detective
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
5
posted on
12/28/2011 9:45:51 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
Good luck.
So far this is shaping up to be just another “vote for the lessser of two evils” presidential election.
That is how we became so disfunctional that a worthless bag of crap like Barack Obama could float to the top.
6
posted on
12/28/2011 9:47:06 AM PST
by
Iron Munro
("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
To: American Constitutionalist; Antoninus; AuH2ORepublican; BlackElk; Carry_Okie; curmudgeonII; ...
Might help if I actually pinged the list. Duh.
7
posted on
12/28/2011 9:49:39 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
In recent days, Santorum's crowds have started growing as he rallies conservatives with a pit bull's pugnaciousness, and just a touch of anger.
I like the anger. One of the knocks on Santorum is that he comes across as "too nice." A little passion could certainly turn that around.
I think Rick is hitting his stride at just the right moment. How great would it be if the voters came out for him...
8
posted on
12/28/2011 9:54:35 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
I’ve been in his corner from the start! I’m hoping and praying for his candidacy.
9
posted on
12/28/2011 9:54:54 AM PST
by
myrabach
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
I would certainly vote for Santorum.
The only problem is that the Democrats had absolutely no trouble booting him from his PA U.S. Senate seat and they know exactly what works against him.
10
posted on
12/28/2011 10:01:27 AM PST
by
Walrus
('illegal immigrant', 'outbreak', 'drill', 'strain', 'virus', 'recovery', 'deaths', 'collapse', 'huma)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
Good.
Santorum really ‘teed me off’ a couple of times at the beginning of the campaign, and I dropped my support for him but I can’t remember the specifics. I CAN remember why I can’t support any of the others. So I’m back in his camp.
To: Walrus
I would certainly vote for Santorum. The only problem is that the Democrats had absolutely no trouble booting him from his PA U.S. Senate seat and they know exactly what works against him.I'm from PA and have known Santorum personally since the early 90s, and it wasn't demonRAT magic that earned Rick his big defeat in '06.
The demonRATs ran the table that year and no pubbie could have won in PA that year, but Rick added 10% to his own defeat by not backing Toomey against sphincter in '04.
The TEA party conservatives {before there was a TEA party} wanted Toomey and Santorum and Bush worked against him in the PA pubbie primary.
Toomey only lost by 2 votes per precinct {a little over 24,000 votes} and we all blamed Bush and Santorum.
There was no conservative action for Santorum that year, and Rick usually draws big crowds at sportsman clubs, VFW, Moose, etal, but in '06 he couldn't draw flies.
I had a "Sportsman for Santorum" bumper sticker on my truck, but took it off in '04 and never put it back on.
He pissed his base off, big time, and us rednecks with our guns and Bibles told him to get along with the support of his new found media friends.
I think he's learned his lesson, and could vote for him, but right now I'm backing Newt, we'll see how it shakes out.
12
posted on
12/28/2011 10:25:34 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
Our stealth Conservative candidate is finally resonating with the base.
He is catching fire at just the right time. I have high hopes for his success in IA.
13
posted on
12/28/2011 10:29:15 AM PST
by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Walrus
The only problem is that the Democrats had absolutely no trouble booting him from his PA U.S. Senate seat and they know exactly what works against him.
So your saying that the Rats will run a Pro Life candidate talking Conservative values against him for POTUS? I didn't know Obummer was Pro Life blue dog. Santorum lost 1 race out of 4 running as a solid Conservative in a notoriously blue state. Can you point to any other of our candidates who have done that?
14
posted on
12/28/2011 10:38:24 AM PST
by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Lazlo in PA
To Santorum supporters:
If it looks going into election day like Perry is gaining fastest among Bachmann, Santorum, and Perry, would you consider voting for Perry?
I’m just curious, because it seems to me that conservatives should be trying to maximize the power of their vote by rallying around one of those three candidates. If they all get 9%, they could, together, outpoll everyone else, but end up in 4th, 5th and 6th place which will have little impact.
On the other hand, if one of the three is supported strongly by election day, he or she could pull off quite an upset, to the advantage of all conservative voters.
15
posted on
12/28/2011 10:41:06 AM PST
by
Norseman
(Defund the Left-Completely!)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
16
posted on
12/28/2011 10:45:21 AM PST
by
Hoodat
(Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
It’s Santorum’s turn, and should he become the next anti-Romney star, he could ride it out for a win. Sadly, it doesn’t seem like that is going to happen.
17
posted on
12/28/2011 10:45:38 AM PST
by
pallis
To: Lazlo in PA
18
posted on
12/28/2011 10:48:58 AM PST
by
Hoodat
(Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
To: Norseman
If it looks going into election day like Perry is gaining fastest among Bachmann, Santorum, and Perry...
So Perry is going to beat himself in the Primaries? That should be a weird turn of events.
19
posted on
12/28/2011 10:49:53 AM PST
by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
If Santorum finished 4th in Iowa, Bachmann should drop out and endorse him. He might well have a good chance in S.C.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson