To: Retain Mike
Negative.
It does NOT say ‘excluded’ at all.
It says the ‘requirement does not apply’. An entirely different concept.
The idea is that they would not be REQUIRED to incarcerate a citizen. But it leaves the door open to be able to if necessary because it does not say that they CAN’T.
13 posted on
12/28/2011 9:46:10 AM PST by
RoadGumby
(This is not where I belong, Take this world and give me Jesus.)
To: RoadGumby; Retain Mike
The idea is that they would not be REQUIRED to incarcerate a citizen. But it leaves the door open to be able to if necessary because it does not say that they CAN’T.
RG has the right of it - the possibility and the empowerment are both there.
14 posted on
12/28/2011 9:50:55 AM PST by
arderkrag
(Georgia is God's Country. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson