All members of Conservatives For Liz Warren (and Conservatives For Barack Obama), sign in here. (i.e., would rather not vote, or vote third party, due to RINO candidate)
Don't forget, according to your liberal "progressive" friends, Brown is a far right "Rethuglican" who wants to starve children, kill old people, lynch blacks, take away your rights... Six years of Dizzy Miss Lizzie instead...?
To: raccoonradio; Andonius_99; Andy'smom; Antique Gal; Big Guy and Rusty 99; bitt; Barset; ...
Howie Carr list ping. Howie is in Florida now, I think.
Just think, maybe a year from now Howie could have a different flagship station and could make a move to do his
show via ISDN line, live from the Sunshine State.
To: raccoonradio
To: nutmeg
5 posted on
12/27/2011 11:02:03 PM PST by
nutmeg
To: raccoonradio
how come the Democrats already are spending millions upon millions of dollars to knock him out of the Senate next year?
They have to win back the Kennedy seat?
8 posted on
12/27/2011 11:28:20 PM PST by
SmithL
To: raccoonradio
Please,please everybody,don’t give up on Scott Brown because you think he isn’t the perfect Republican or Conservative. Think about what an improvement he is over the late Ted Kennedy insofar as not supporting progressive liberal positions.
To: raccoonradio
Brown is a rare quasi-semi-conservative in an otherwise pure moonbatly territory. If there are other, better possibilities there to push for, sure, push for them.
A similar soul searching moment is going to happen when/if the GOP nominates Mitt Romney for president. Herd of cats time.
10 posted on
12/28/2011 12:37:07 AM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: raccoonradio
My question is, if Scott Brown is so damn liberal, how come the Democrats already are spending millions upon millions of dollars to knock him out of the Senate next year? Because he's a Republican.
Wait a minute. Is this a trick question?
11 posted on
12/28/2011 12:45:06 AM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: raccoonradio
What a steaming load of crap. Whenever the Democrats needed him, they knew they could count on him. But ooooh, he’s gonna force the Dems to spend money. Gosh, like they never spent money on Massachusetts Senate races when Kennedy was in office?
Scott Brown is the enemy. Period.
12 posted on
12/28/2011 12:55:15 AM PST by
dangus
To: raccoonradio
I get your point. Massachusetts is a lost cause. Not an ounce of brains to be found anywhere. Even with all those over-priced colleges and universities.
Poor Massachusetts. The California of the east coast. Except nobody lives there.
13 posted on
12/28/2011 12:58:23 AM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: raccoonradio
Gosh. If only we had more Scott Browns in The Senate.
15 posted on
12/28/2011 1:02:18 AM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: raccoonradio
For years the republican party has foisted go along get along types like Juan McLame, Bob Dull, and RINO ass clowns like Scott Brown. And our govt just keeps rediculously spending my money.
I will no longer hold my nose to support crappola.
Real conservatives or go fish.
To: raccoonradio
People on here would rather have a Democrat who votes with Obama 100% of the time than have a Republican who votes conservative 75% of the time. Pretty impressive for MA. Hey, let’s just elect another liberal to the Kennedy seat. Isn’t that what the Swimmer would want?
Conservatives are stuck on stupid.
17 posted on
12/28/2011 2:35:35 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: raccoonradio
Yes. When RINO stop trying to pick our candidates, I may consider ignoring them. For now, they have to go.
19 posted on
12/28/2011 3:11:17 AM PST by
AdaGray
To: raccoonradio
Of course I will vote for Brown over Warren but the assertion that Voting for Dodd Frank was just a mistake that any of us could have made is dead wrong. In my opinion Dodd Frank had a more immediate devastating effect on the economy than Obama care. Brown voted for the bill knowing full well that he was handing Obama appointees unprecedented powers over the free market.
21 posted on
12/28/2011 3:54:48 AM PST by
JIM O
To: raccoonradio
23 posted on
12/28/2011 4:09:25 AM PST by
CPT Clay
(Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
To: raccoonradio
My question is, if Scott Brown is so damn liberal, how come the Democrats already are spending millions upon millions of dollars to knock him out of the Senate next year? For the same reason Stalin had an ice pick stuck in the back of Trotsky's head.
Socialist tyrants hate competition. Even from other socialists.
Carr is an unprincipled dolt.
To: raccoonradio
I'll take a "liberal" like Brown over a "conservative" like Little Bobby Casey or Bart Stupak any day.
28 posted on
12/28/2011 6:09:12 AM PST by
Tribune7
(Vote Perry (or Gingrich maybe))
To: raccoonradio
I don’t care about Scott Brown. He does not care about the Tea Party, either. So everybody’s happy.
To: raccoonradio
I know, its early, but all you Brown haters, be careful what you wish for. Do you really want six years of buyers remorse?
I don't...
40 posted on
12/28/2011 1:58:12 PM PST by
ExCTCitizen
(If we stay home in November '12... Don't complain if 0 shreds the constitution!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson