Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr
"Iowa caucus is meaningless. It should be shunned into the dustbin of primary history. I wish that candidates would pass it by next time."

There is a reason campaigns campaign in Iowa. True, Iowa doesn't always pick the winner, but it is early, and that can mean much to a campaign.

19 posted on 12/27/2011 2:49:59 PM PST by Designer (Nit-pickin' and chagrinin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Designer

You’re correct, its value to campaigns is that it’s the first, and that’s also by design for Iowa to have the money and influence that this brings.

If I were king though, it would not continue in this. It doesn’t deserve it and it distorts the primary too much in the wrong direction. Iowa’s caucus process is particularly weird and ripe for manipulation. The results are nigh meaningless.

So, it’s a wish on my part: that, somehow, it be rejected and removed from its current status.

thanks for your reply.


23 posted on 12/27/2011 2:58:13 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Designer
Exactly.

Our caucus, being the very first, is a long way from the election. In politics, even a week can seem like a lifetime.

I agree with the philosophy of many campaign managers in the past. The important thing in Iowa is to come out of it in the top three contenders. No lower than fourth.

The whittling down of the number of candidates has to start somewhere.

37 posted on 12/27/2011 7:22:30 PM PST by 2111USMC (Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson