You keep changing your story and missing the point. I suspect it’s because if you actually tried to take on an intellectual debate, the weaknesses of your argument would be right there for even you to see (everyone else has already seen it).
I have nuked every point you have made. You have failed to respond to any of my points - you merely change the subject. That’s what folks do when way over their heads. That’s where you are.
Until you can actually process some point I have made and counter it, I am done (and very bored) with you.
Sorry, but you haven’t done anything to my argument, i.e., a law is a law that needs to be followed until changed. No one has taken issue with it before in its entire history. I understand that you don’t like the outcome here. But that’s not outcome determinative. The law was applied equally here, and your guy (which one of the five I don’t know) came up short. Too bad for you, but it has no impact on whether the law has application here. Your nukes are but mosquitoes buzzing around my ear.