Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Razzz42
If you bothered to post some hard numbers, you might have some credibility. A certain amount of radiation is harmful. Only in the general vicinity of the plant is the radiation at truly dangerous levels.

Until you post some hard numbers demonstrating that the radiation here is dangerous you are wasting everyone's time with your paranoia.

21 posted on 12/25/2011 8:26:22 PM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: hopespringseternal
Level 7 apparently leaves you clueless and is old news. Level 7 -- Fukushima Vs Chernobyl -- How Do They Really Compare? Again the latest on the reported figures and unreported figures, if you bother to read it, the comments have even more current information. Canadian Medical Association Journal Blasts Japanese Government: \"Culture of Coverup\" Exposing Japanese Citizens to \"Unconscionable\" Radiation Risk If you are seriously trying to comprehend this event then you can at least tell me how much nuclear fuel is involved in the (3) meltdowns. I'll give you a hint: It's measured in hundreds of tons (some of it MOX fuel) and anything it comes in contact with becomes radioactive contamination.
22 posted on 12/25/2011 10:08:05 PM PST by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson