Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: staytrue
Tailor made? Indeed.

The "rules" in Virginia favor(ed) Romney since
he was EXEMPT from the the "rules",
that made a "St." not a street ... to exclude the Speaker.

FReepers and America have watched
Team Romney 'hack' down Gov. Palin (and her children),
Mr. Cain, and previously Sen. Thompson, Gov. Huckabee,
... as Romney has helped and lauded Obama.

It is NO secret that the GOP is on open 'double secret probation'
and is about to go DOWN THE TUBES
and the way of the dinosaurs and Whigs.

By their choice ... and the 'helmlock' of Rove.

And given the lack of moral fiber of the lying RINOs
the sooner the better for America.

7 posted on 12/24/2011 8:13:03 PM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Diogenesis

If Newt had gotten 15,000 signatures, he would have been exempt from the address checks too. And he could’ve hired anyone no matter how shady to collect the signatures, since they wouldn’t be checked. He lost the ground game on this one either due to a lack of time, money or both. Just getting 4,000 more signatures would have been easier than trying to fight the system and get the law or rules changed now.

I can see a big problem having a write-in option in a primary that’s open for both parties to vote in. What’s to stop the other party from rallying together and writing in their own candidate? Of course if they want to nominate a sure loser against Obama they’ve already got a couple good choices available on this ballot.

It sounds like the best option would be to waive the requirement on the address checks so that Newt’s signatures wouldn’t be thrown out. However, that could be unfair to the other candidates like Santorum. They may not have tried to collect signatures, feeling they couldn’t get enough to overcome the address checks. But it wouldn’t exactly be fair to extend the deadline for a couple of weeks when the other candidates had a big head start based on the old rules.

I hope our members in all of the states are signed up to be on Newt’s mailing list. I saw people on here claiming they were not contacted by the campaign to help out with signatures, but Newt said they did e-mail supporters on Monday and asked publicly for help on Tuesday. Granted, that’s a last-minute start. Newt’s larger mistake may be trying to run his campaign as a big money campaign when it should be run as a grass-roots campaign that gets supporters more involved.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/20/9587046-virginia-ballot-deadline-looms-large-for-gingrich-campaign

““We barely made it in Ohio and we may barely make it Thursday in Virginia,” said Gingrich. “We’re asking all of our friends in Virginia to go to Newt.org and volunteer to get petitions signed in the next 48 hours.”

To that end, the campaign sent out an email to supporters Monday asking for help getting on the Virginia ballot. The email, which also announced Gingrich will himself be in Virginia Wednesday for a rally, asked supporters to get people out to one of nearly a dozen signature stations the campaign has set up in at least eight of the state’s 11 congressional districts.”


37 posted on 12/24/2011 9:48:46 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Diogenesis

Romney wasn’t exempt from the rules. He had to turn in signatures just like the other candidates. He had over 16,000 signatures. He turned in the number needed to avoid strict scrutiny of his ballots.

However, from the rumors about how many ballots of Gingrich’s were rejected, if Gingrich had turned in 16,000 signatures, he’d have qualified even under strict scrutiny — and of course he wouldn’t have had his ballots checked, being over 15,000.

I’m surprised anybody knows the truth anymore, because falsehood and conjecture makes it around the world on the internet without a care for the facts.


47 posted on 12/24/2011 10:52:52 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson