Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Nope wouldn't vote For Ron "I'm against Earmarks But I'll add mine to the Bill and Vote against it" Paul for all the Tea In China.

But I have been involved with Petitions for Candidacy for many years and I know you must get 50% more Signatures than you need to assure you have enough legit Sigs to qualify. Lots of the Candidates didn't manage such and will now not be on the ballot. Yeah there is dirty tricks afoot in Virginia and many of the other Primary States but Damn it this is not some new development this is how it has been for years.

You've got to play on the field as is once the game starts and crying after the fact only shows you weren't ready for the Big Boy Games.

I've been screwing myself up to Vote for Gingrich (He barely made the grade to be on the Ballot in Ohio.) now that Cain is out of the picture. But no matter what I won't vote for Mitt.

84 posted on 12/24/2011 9:23:54 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg

Yes we can all Cherry Pick where a candidate did something hypocritical. Nevertheless, economically speaking Paul is definitely more conservative than Newt.

I would not accuse anyone of sabotage unless you have actual proof. This sure makes Newt look very incompetent.


96 posted on 12/24/2011 9:32:26 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson