Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar; P-Marlowe

I’m repeating what a legal firm has suggested. A news article on the same says that Virginia’s laws far exceed other states.

Therefore, I can only conclude it is about something more than simply discouraging over-participation.

Uniformly applying an unjust law does not guarantee equal protection, and the fact that it hasn’t been challenged to date simply doesn’t excuse the law if it, in fact, denies equal protection.


194 posted on 12/24/2011 10:45:50 AM PST by xzins (Pray for Our Troops Remaining in Afghanistan, now that Iran Can Focus on Injuring Only Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; kabar; PSYCHO-FREEP; C. Edmund Wright; Mad Dawgg; P-Marlowe; wmfights
Uniformly applying an unjust law does not guarantee equal protection, and the fact that it hasn’t been challenged to date simply doesn’t excuse the law if it, in fact, denies equal protection.

You have to have standing to challenge it. Nobody had standing before.

But any candidate who was denied a place on the ballot now has the standing to challenge this rule.

I only hope and pray that Perry and Gingrich and Bachman and Santorum all march down to the court on Tuesday and file their lawsuits. I will contribute to the defense fund.

This kind of arbitrary rule making just irks me to no end. The system is designed to protect incumbents who don't have to qualify under this system. It also encourages and rewards election fraud.

Every patriotic conservative should be up in arms over this.

208 posted on 12/24/2011 10:55:38 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson