Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar; P-Marlowe

Apparently other states limit access just fine by charging a 1000 bucks. Not too many are willing to waste a 1000 bucks just for the notoriety of being proven stupid in public.

As one legal firm has pointed out, though, the VA law, due to some having signatures reviewed and some not, probably denies equal protection, and that contrary to Bush v Gore.


178 posted on 12/24/2011 10:34:34 AM PST by xzins (Pray for Our Troops Remaining in Afghanistan, now that Iran Can Focus on Injuring Only Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Hey! Don’t you know? You’re supposed to accept the Rules as the rules are written.

The RULES make themselves as do those who blindly support them.


185 posted on 12/24/2011 10:40:01 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I guess the rules would have been ok if certain candidates had been able to get on the ballot. Now you are suggesting the VA has unfair election laws. The fact is that the law was applied uniformly to all candidates regardless of party affiliation. Let those who didn’t make it file a legal challenge against the Commonwealth.


188 posted on 12/24/2011 10:42:07 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson