Things change when you have candidates who are disorganized and poorly funded that they can’t comply with the rules.
It was not a problem in 2008.
>> Things change when you have candidates who are disorganized and poorly funded that they can’t comply with the rules.
It was not a problem in 2008.>>
There you go: admission that you are holding being “poorly funded” against a candidate. So, only the folks who raise money early so they can go pay drones to get signatures collected is an important test to you huh?
Mark Kabar down: one enthusiastic YES vote for the richest candidates only.