[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Then by your logic, we need not complain when we only have Romney or Paul to vote for.......Nice.

But the poster you are attacking, is not the one who is “emotionally unstable”.

Let's see what Jim Robinson thinks?

[C. Edmund Wright]

The people who are unstable are those who claim to be conservative, claim to love freedom, claim to want a change in DC - and yet hold fast to a system that is clearly set up to enforce the power of unelected bureaucrats (within the Va GOP) and clearly set up to favor the perennial candidates (Paul and Mitt) and clearly set up to favor the well connected (Mitt and Va’s LT Gov) and clearly set up to favor the rich candiates (ability to pay drones to go collect signatures.)

Anyone who favors such an intellectually bankrupt system - and does so on the “rules are rules” mentality - is clearly intellectually “UNSTABLE.”

[Sprite518]

PSYCHO-FREEP,

I'm not attacking... I'm defending another Freeper that was attacked by C. Edmund Wright for having a different point of view. Yesterday C. Edmund Wright was not debating but insulting or ridiculing other Freepers that had a different point of view. Thus, that is an emotional reaction vs. a logical argument. You don't win people over by insulting or ridiculing them.

You can make a point of view without personally insulting or ridiculing another Freeper. Why do you think it's okay to insult or ridicule another Freeper with a different point of view??? Do you really believe that makes them want to listen to what you have to say?