Which doesn't say much for Romney because I think Paul is a senile appeasing quasi-rational coot.
But we still got Perry, Newt, Santorum, Michele (who I really don't like all that much but at least she's not senile), and even Huntsman.
To me Rick Perry is the only real choice. OK he botched the immigration issue, but he’s rock solid on everything else. I remember going to a Tea Party rally on April 15th 2009. I’d never been to a political rally in my life. I remember how down and sad the peoples faces looked as I got to the rally. One of the first things announced at the rally was that Rick Perry was talking about Texas leaving the union, and how he supported the Tea Party. It was a lonely position then, but he stood up.
Those are two bad choices but I would come to the same conclusion as you have. I just have very little confidence that romney would work to reverse zero’s socialist policies at the EPA, healthcare, and as it pertains to overall spending. romney cannot even admit that zero is a socialist and does not seem to want to attack zero.
Same here - Paul's a lunatic in a lot of areas, but at least he is serious about fiscal responsibility. His overt lack of willingness to spank the bad guys around the globe is at least a known quantity and he'd be ridden out on a rail if he allowed us to be attacked and failed to respond. Mitt would likely take ineffectual actions or try Obama's supposed "strategy" and try to "reason" with our enemies.