Or is it this one.
“The Duke’s Victory
David Duke received 44% of the vote in the Senate primary race in Louisiana, 60% of the white vote, and 9% of the black vote!. This totaled 100,000 more votes the current governor when he won.
Duke lost the election, but he scared the blazes out of the Establishment. If the official Republican hadn’t been ordered to drop out, he might have won. Certainly there would have been a run-off.
Duke’s platform called for tax cuts, no quotes, no affirmative action, no welfare, and no busing. “Tonight, we...” end of page 3.
or is this the part you are objecting to?
You are getting there. Obviously, pimping for Duke, cheering that this Klan leader almost won, promoting the bs propoganda that Duke was just about tax cuts, welfare, etc, is where the line is crossed.
Do you not have a problem with the promotion of a Klan leader? Do you not have a problem with Paul’s cheering the sheep’s clothing the wolf donned knowing full well who the wolf is?