[USS Alaska]

I can't think of a better way to unite conservative voters than to tell them that because we require a photo ID to vote, just like you need to cash your check or buy Colt 45 or Kools or get on an airplane etc. that we are racists.

If they think that this is going to help them, holder and his racist band of lawyers is way off base.

[JimRed]

The WaComPost’s discussion forum is loaded with lefty morons lying about the reasons for their objections to voter ID. I stated that since it applies to everyone it is not discriminatory.

I’ll check beck to see how many names I get called...

[sourcery]

The DOJ has no authority to overrule SCOTUS, who have already ruled that requiring ID to vote is Constitutional.

[Bender2]

You cannot do just about anything nowadays without a photo ID... but you can get welfare and vote without one!

Hey, you wouldn't understand... it's a Black thing!

That's telling him... Darth!

If red X above go to http://morrisonworldnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Us-Attorney-General-Eric-Holder-Photo-AP-500x375.jpg

[elpadre]

are Justice Department rulings equivalent to law?? If so, why??

[Right Wing Assault]

So, when Obamacare kicks in and gives free health care to everyone and his pet dog and cat, will it be discrimination to make them show photo ID?

[momf]

Photo I.D. AND sticking a thumb into a pot of purple indelible ink would be a great idea. I wouldn’t mind that - ‘course, I’ve never wanted to vote twice before the last election. Now, it might be a counter-move some places!

[PGalt]

Thanks for the ping; post; and GREAT thread. FUEH, FUBO.

[Carry me back]

When other states have the same law how can SC be singles out and called discriminatory. They need to remove Holder and Obama.

[Dante3]

Holder and the Justice Dept. are running amok. They, along with the open borders, the hordes of illegal aliens, and activist judges, pose the greatest danger to this country.