I guess you’re saying that Mitch can stand on principle because he’s a “leader”. If that’s the case, I wonder exactly how long and how high up the ladder does Gowdy think one must be to stand on principle?
However, Gowdy says the senate, not the senate “leaders”, should stand on principle. Can you blitheringly understand that?
I’ll say it one more time so you may grasp it. Gowdy tells the SENATE, not just the ML, to stand on principle. But he doesn’t do it himself.
Trying to have a discussion with you is like trying to have a discussion with a democrat. It’s a blithering waste of time.
I am typing very slowly so that you can understand. Basically your entire argument ignores the entire reality of leadership and authority and the notion that leaders in every walk of life have a higher responsiblity because they have more authority.
Since you ignore that reality of all of life, you and I are done here. Go enjoy your irrelevant purity.