now the theory that he wanted to support it is totally different. In other words, you are calling him a liar. Maybe you are right, but that’s an entirely different conversation and I would submit to you that the burden of proof for that is ALL ON YOU for this situation.
Sorry for the misunderstanding...but I’m saying he did nothing to stop it when he could...the vote or unanimous consent is...by saying nothing you implicitly are supporting.
Its called consent...therefore he consented.
I’m not saying he isn’t pissed off and right on this issue. All I am saying is don’t jump up and down and try to gain favor...when he did nothing to stop it....in fact he consented.