To: marktwain
The Dem talking point on this is “Why are the Republicans making a big deal out of this since Fast and Furious started under the Bush administration?” However I read in a recent post that one gun was lost and the program was stopped immediately, then restarted under Holder and company.
Anybody got the skinny on this?
To: traintown57
To: traintown57; LucyT; vette6387; MetaThought; 60Gunner; XHogPilot; FreedomPoster; Josephat; ...
Click on keyword gunrunner or fast and furious. Ain't nobody who's been following this for a year gonna try and 'splain it all to you now. But here are some links to get you on your way.
FOR REFERENCE:
FOX VIDEOS
CNN VIDEOS
CBS VIDEOS
IN AT THE BEGINNING, PART 1
IN AT THE BEGINNING, PART 2
IN AT THE BEGINNING, PART 3
In Part 4 of In at the beginning we will explore the interface between the State Department, the CIA and the Gunwalker Plot.
But, I do fear the loss of my honor and would rather die fighting than to have it said that I was without courage. So I will fight you, no matter how insurmountable it may seem, to the death if need be, in order that it may never be said of me that I was not a warrior. -Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry
To: traintown57
Why are the Republicans making a big deal out of this since Fast and Furious started under the Bush administration? However I read in a recent post that one gun was lost and the program was stopped immediately, then restarted under Holder and company. The difference between Gunrunner and F&F is that the former actually tracked the weapons. The latter made no such attempt. Hence, Hillary/Holder's programme was intended to arm Mexican drug cartels with which to help justify a police state while simultaneously justifying the UN Small Arms Treaty.
IOW, disarm Americans and arm violent Mexican criminals.
54 posted on
12/24/2011 9:55:37 AM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson