From Reuters? Disinformation.
Typically I don’t trust Reuters but they are simply saying Paul or Paul’s group sent out newsletters with questionable content. That content was accompanied by his signature.
Either he supported what was written at one time, or isn’t willing to take any responsibility for newsletters bearing his name. We already have a president who doesn’t take responsibility.
There was no proof of of fire with Cain, but there was enough smoke to push him out of the race. Ron Paul’s newsletters will be played up to an even greater level if he was to somehow get the nod. Im pretty sure he couldn’t survive that.
He admitted to the newsletter stuff back in 1996, in the Houston Chronicle, there was a thread her about it a week ago.