To: Antoninus
I'd happily support Santorum (or Bachmann, or Cain, or Palin) as such a nomination would be indicative of a swing in government back to "of the people, by the people, for the people". Candidates of this caliber drive the liberals with their hands held out looking for their free goodies crazy. Likewise they drive the elitist republican country club types who view themselves as the contemporary bourgeoisie equally mad. This to me, a joe-the-plumber type citizen, is a win. A big win. I don't see that impact coming from any of the other candidates at present. Not even with Gingrich. Though he is not a friend of the current bourgeoisie, I fear he'd be all to pleased to start his own country club. We need to determine who best to write-in when the GOP hands us Romney on the ballot. If that candidate is Santorum, I'm fine with it and totally on-board. The same goes for Bachmann, Palin, and Cain. It'll be a battle to talk me into any one else at present.
31 posted on
12/21/2011 12:55:21 PM PST by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: so_real
I agree about Santorum, Bachmann and Palin being the best choices. Gingrich is the worst along with Huntsman. Rick Perry is light years better than Gingrich.
49 posted on
12/22/2011 8:24:03 AM PST by
John360
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson