No the case is not closed. F&F is not not about gun control.
If they wanted gun control they had the House, Senate, and Presidency for 2 years and nobody could stop them. The gun control crowd was at an all time high right after the 08 election.
To come up with a plan that increases the number of people opposed to gun control, as a way of getting more gun control, doesn’t make sense on it’s face.
They intend for these weapons to be used, just like in the 1996 election when B Clinton’s buddies the Chinese, were arming up the gangs with full auto weapons to make sure Clinton didn’t leave office.
If they wanted gun control they had the House, Senate, and Presidency for 2 years and nobody could stop them. The gun control crowd was at an all time high right after the 08 election.
F&F was about appeasing the gun grabber base, especially those who wanted to re-instate a so called "assault weapons ban" and a .50 caliber ban. Those weapons were smuggled for a reason. The gun grabbers were obsessed by them.
Go back to 2006. The rats understood that they were losing on social issues. They started running candidates who were pro-Second Amendment and pro-life where necessary, e.g. Bob Casey for Senator in PA. They took the Congress back in 2006, and they grew their majorities in 2008.
In 2009, when talk about renewing an "assault weapons ban" was proposed by Holder, over 60 pro-Second Amendment rat Congressmen sent Holder a letter to forget about it. It was a no-go if they wanted to keep a majority in the House.
Obama was being threatened by bad ratings by Sara Brady et al. Hence the scheme to do something "under the radar."
IMR 4350, ask yourself, why did the rats not propose any serious gun grabbing bills when they they controlled the Congress from January 2007 until January 2011?