Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil giant BP to exit the solar sector as numbers fail to add up
Recharge ^ | December 20 2011 | Andrew Lee

Posted on 12/20/2011 11:46:59 AM PST by thackney

Oil giant BP is preparing to exit the solar industry entirely.

BP is preparing to wind down its BP Solar unit and sell-off the stakes it has in various projects around the world.

A document announcing the decision to the 100 employees who will be affected says changes in the solar industry have left BP unable to achieve sufficient margins in the sector.

It says the decision is made with regret after a “near 40-year commitment to solar energy”.

A BP spokesman confirms the move and says that over the last six months "regrettably we have come to the decision that we can't make solar viable for BP".

The spokesman says BP will engage with its various solar partners around the world and would aim to exit projects "in a way that leaves them viable".

The UK group had already pulled back from module manufacturing to concentrate on project development.

In July it shut its factory in Maryland, US, ending a process that saw some 460 US jobs cut over two years.

It had earlier axed manufacturing capacity in Spain.

In an interview with Recharge last autumn, Katrina Landis, chief executive of BP Alternative Energy said: “The Chinese have effectively commoditised manufacturing of PV panels. You simply cannot compete with China’s ability to produce PV panels that have the quality required to satisfy Western customers.”

BP’s interests in other clean-energy sectors, prominently wind and biofuels, are unaffected, says the spokesman.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bp; energy; gas; oil; solar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 12/20/2011 11:47:06 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

duh


2 posted on 12/20/2011 11:49:03 AM PST by Doogle (((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Imagine that.


3 posted on 12/20/2011 11:50:22 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Of course. The nature can take care of itself. Pollution is overrated, scared tactics anyway.

See how “devastated” the gulf is now?


4 posted on 12/20/2011 11:51:00 AM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Exiting a boondoggle.


5 posted on 12/20/2011 11:51:14 AM PST by headstamp 2 (Time to move forward not to the center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Beginning of the end for solar.


6 posted on 12/20/2011 11:51:22 AM PST by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Did we cut solar subsidies to BP? That alone could do it.


7 posted on 12/20/2011 11:52:25 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

But, but,....


8 posted on 12/20/2011 11:53:23 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I’m stunned by this unexpected outcome.


9 posted on 12/20/2011 11:54:10 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

BP trying to kill the polar bears and melt the glaciers screams coming from MSNBC in 3...2...1


10 posted on 12/20/2011 11:58:48 AM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The enviroloonies’ “alternative energy” thing doesn’t seem to be working out.


11 posted on 12/20/2011 11:59:26 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Stop BIG Government Greed Now!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

In other news, BP, “Beyond Petroleum”, is changing its name to BTP, and hence, “Back To Petroleum”.


12 posted on 12/20/2011 11:59:31 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Any idea as to how many millions (billions?) of dollars in Green Subsidies BP accepted (and presumably flushed down the hole) from the US and others (BP is a *British* corporation, with strong ties to the EU) before packing it in??


13 posted on 12/20/2011 12:01:01 PM PST by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

I worked at Solar Power Corporation of America in 1982. It was a subsidiary of Exxon. The only reason it existed was to make the panels for the AramCo pipeline.


14 posted on 12/20/2011 12:01:14 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney
commoditised- no dictionary results

I guess they mean to commodify or make a commodity of solar. Not difficult where people will work for peanuts.

If BP had been in favor with The Administration they would have been showered with cash to support their solar whatever.

15 posted on 12/20/2011 12:01:56 PM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

So they have seen the error in their ways.


16 posted on 12/20/2011 12:02:16 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (VOTE 'ECONOMIC FREEDOM'! NO more 0bamao!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

I don’t think the US has yet, but some other countries have begun to see the light.

http://www.google.com/search?q=solar+subsidies+cut&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#q=solar+subsidies+cut&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&prmd=imvnsu&source=lnms&tbm=nws&ei=VufwToupAubQ2wW0seWqAg&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=5&ved=0CBcQ_AUoBA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=c9a5e542d2eadacb&biw=1680&bih=861


17 posted on 12/20/2011 12:02:40 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Solar power is great for watches and calculators, but not so much for anything that needs reliable and consistent oomph.


18 posted on 12/20/2011 12:03:24 PM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

where do the greenie weinies go from here? Do they claim we didn’t spend enough money?
Perhaps, perpetual motion?


19 posted on 12/20/2011 12:05:06 PM PST by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
"BP’s interests in other clean-energy sectors, prominently wind and biofuels, are unaffected, says the spokesman."

In other words the subsidy money hasn't dried up completely in these areas yet...

20 posted on 12/20/2011 12:05:57 PM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson