[Jim Robinson]

We've all known on FR for a very long time that the liberal activist judiciary is a large part of the problem. What the liberals can't get done legislatively, they simply get the activist courts to do for them. Roe vs Wade for example.

I give credit to Gingrich for recognizing that they must be reined in. The dunderhead Romney sure as hell won't. He blames the judges in Massachusetts for gay marriage on his watch but refuses to lift a finger to oppose them.

[Diogenesis]

Romney imposed his fascist decisions himself.

"Governor Mitt Romney, who touts his conservative credentials to out-of-state Republicans,
has passed over GOP lawyers for three-quarters of the 36 judicial vacancies he has faced,
instead tapping registered Democrats or independents -- including two gay lawyers who
have supported expanded same-sex rights, a Globe review of the nominations has found.
Of the 36 people Romney named to be judges or clerk magistrates, 23 are either registered Democrats
or unenrolled voters who have made multiple contributions to Democratic politicians
or who voted in Democratic primaries, state and local records show.
In all, he has nominated nine registered Republicans, 13 unenrolled voters,
and 14 registered Democrats."
- Boston Globe 7/25/2005

---

Romney Rewards one of the State's Leading Anti-Marriage Attorneys by Making him a Judge
Romney told the U.S. Senate on June 22, 2004, that the "real threat to the States is not the
constitutional amendment process, in which the states participate,
but activist judges who disregard the law and redefine marriage . . ."
Romney sounds tough but yet he had no qualms advancing the legal career of one
of the leading anti-marriage attorneys. He nominated Stephen Abany to a District Court.
Abany has been a key player in the Massachusetts Lesbian and Gay Bar Association which,
in its own words, is "dedicated to ensuring that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision
on marriage equality is upheld, and that any anti-gay amendment or legislation is defeated."
- U.S. Senate testimony by Gov. Mitt Romney, 6/22/2004 P>

---

"Romney announces he won't fill judicial vacancies before term ends
Despite his rhetoric about judicial activism, Romney announced that
he won't fill all the remaining vacancies during his term - but instead
leave them for his liberal Democrat successor!
Governor Mitt Romney pledged yesterday not to make a flurry of lame-duck
judicial appointments in the final days of his administration . . . David Yas,
editor of Lawyers Weekly, said Romney is "bucking tradition" by resisting the urge to
fill all remaining judgeships. "It is a tradition for governors to use that power to appoint judges
aggressively in the waning moments of their administration," Yas said.
He added that Romney has been criticized for failing to make judicial appointments.
"The legal community has consistently criticized him for not filling open seats quickly enough
and being a little too painstaking in the process and being dismissive of the input of the
Judicial Nominating Commission," Yas said.
- Boston Globe 11/2/2006

[Lazamataz]

I’ve got mixed feelings about this. I feel it was giving the opposition a wide-open sound byte: “Newt wants to arrest the Supreme Court!”

He could have been a lot more finessed about that, refraining to say what actions he would take against Justices that refused Congressional subpeonas for appearance.

Other than that, I think I’m interested in this idea.

[BilLies]

“John Marshall has made his decision: now let him enforce it!”
Jackson, Andrew

[wildbill]

While most conservatives agree that legislating judges are ruining the balance of the three divisions of our government, I think a lot of us also recoil from the idea of the party in power hauling judges before Congress in chains because of a bad decision.

The constitutional way to change is by accumulating legislative power to make reforms.

Newt returning to his anti-productive bomb throwing ways simply makes me remember why he was forced out of power after leading the Republicans to victory.

Let’s rally around Perry.

[EDINVA]

The list of judicial overstepping is virtually endless. Consider Kelo, or California’s Prop 187 on immigration and Prop 8 on gay marriage that both won electorally, then were taken to the courts where black robes decided they were unconstitutional.

Newt famously comes up with big ideas, the details of which often need refinement, but give him credit for having the big ideas and willingness then to work on those details.

[Sgt_Schultze]

The trouble is, establishment Republicans will resist remediating the judiciary through this method. The next time libdems take full control, they will implement it against courts which uphold the Constitution.