What you forget is that governing within the confins of the Constitution is much better for the nation’s security than threatening other countries. You also seem to forget that Paul would not be opposed to going to war SO LONG AS there is a declaration of war in the Congress. What you forget is that acting as the world’s policemen is far more of a threat to the nation’s security as it spreads the military out too thin / costs money we can not afford & puts us at higher risk for the lax borders where a larger terrorist threat looms. Paul would actually secure the borders unlike any other candidate so there is no question that the nation’s security would in fact be far better under a President Ron Paul.
At best, Ron Paul is Don Quixote, Man of La Mancha. And his supporters are Sancho Panzas.
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, since the literary analogy is a near-perfect one.
In either event, he will never be President of the United States.
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you.