>> This was an OPINION, not a statement of purpose. The Chief Executive has no power to start firing judges. >>
Of course. Stream of consciousness thought to make the listener think and to demonstrate the absurdity of the court’s power now.
Too many around here cannot (or will not) tell the difference between the two. They are shallow thinkers looking for reasons NOT to support candidates, and they micro analyze sound bytes or quotes looking for such. Thus, they’ll always gravitate towards monolithic repetitive clones instead of free thinkers. They’ll never “get” Newt, but they’ll isolate a few quotes and swear that they do.
They also act like every idea or opinon (like Cain’s 999) will suddenly be thrust upon us if we dare nominate that person. Really shallow and out of context analysis by sooooo many.
There you go again, spouting off about how stupid everyone else is, as evidenced by the fact that they don’t agree with you.
And please don’t try that line, again, “ever heard of generalization?”
If all you’ve got is “everybody else is stupid and a shallow thinker or doesn’t have life success or name ID or connections,” that dog won’t hunt.
Thank you for that.
A fresh breeze of clarity wafting through the smudge.
Sometimes I’m just too disappointed by what seems like a dilution of what FR used to be to rebut.