Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Correct. Congress also has the power to limit the kinds of cases that federal judges could hear on appeal. All this is proper and constitutional. But that is NOT what Newt said. He spoke about not following Supreme Court judgments. This is totally different. Just think the howls of protests we’d hear on this site if Obama said something like this. Much as we embrace Newt’s constitutional values he may just have cooked himself with this remark. Expect leading conservative figures disassociate themselves from this remark in the next few days followed by a slump in the polls. Sad but inevitable.


120 posted on 12/17/2011 6:33:54 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: Steelfish; P-Marlowe
As a nationally elected official -- the only one in the entire USA, the President's oath of office is to support and defend the Constitution.

If he believes the Scotus justices are wrong, he is required by his oath to oppose their rulings.

The Constitution says:

"Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: — "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." "

121 posted on 12/17/2011 6:44:12 PM PST by xzins (Pray for Our Troops Remaining in Afghanistan, now that Iran Can Focus on Injuring Only Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson