Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertarianInExile

Paul is crazy. This is not an insult. I’m simply pointing out that “Dr. Paul” says things that are provably false and uses them as ammunition *against* the United States. Bachmann was correct when she said that he was dangerously naive. Paul might have reasonably coherent answers on domestic policy. The problem is that his foreign policy answers - which have ranged from naive to insane to dangerous - are an automatic disqualifier. I don’t care how well you can remodel my house if you aren’t going to luck the f***ing door.

Get this through your head. Ron Paul is *not* Presidential material.


67 posted on 12/16/2011 7:18:09 PM PST by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: flintsilver7

Well said


68 posted on 12/16/2011 7:22:55 PM PST by svcw (God's Grace - thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: flintsilver7

“Get this through your head. Ron Paul is *not* Presidential material.”

So he doesn’t have the right stuff to be president, but barky does? Barky is after all the President.

I find these anti-Ron Paul threads fascinating. If Ron Paul were as insane, delusional, evil, wicked, antisemitic, pacifist or naive as the bulk of the posters seem to think, there is no way he would be doing as well as he is. He’d be getting the 1-2% that John Huntsman is getting. But in actuality he’s got a fair shot at winning in Iowa. And depending on the poll he’s either number 2 or 3 in NH.

Oh, I forgot. Everybody except those who are anti-Ron Paul are insane, delusional, evil, wicked, antisemitic, pacifist or naive.


76 posted on 12/16/2011 9:19:55 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: flintsilver7

“The problem is that his foreign policy answers - which have ranged from naive to insane to dangerous - are an automatic disqualifier. I don’t care how well you can remodel my house if you aren’t going to luck the f***ing door.”

As if the past umpteen residents of 1600 PA are locking the door, and the other leading GOP contenders are slamming it somehow. Gingrich and Romney are ready to amnesty in a floodgate of illegals. Meanwhile, Paul is the only candidate who is willing to redeploy troops to the borders, instead of sending them to Korea, Germany, Japan, or any number of countries that we defend with our soldiers’ lives. Those countries could perfectly well pay for their own defense and put their own kids’ necks on the blocks, but we both pay for the defense of these countries and put our grandkids’ wallets on the blocks borrowing to do it—at the same time we’re giving oodles of foreign aid and trade/import concessions to the countries we’re defending AGAINST. Oh, yeah, it’s Paul that’s crazy, all right. /sarc


98 posted on 12/21/2011 2:11:03 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Newt Gingrich, a great conservative? Before he was Speaker and had to walk the walk, sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson