Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

OMG.. what a horrible title. I would hope animal suffering did not have a political divide! I would hope all people abhorred any animal suffering....ugh.


4 posted on 12/16/2011 7:36:40 AM PST by Fawn (NEWT FOR PRESIDENT 2012~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fawn

Define “suffering”, some would say separating a dog or cat from its’ mother to make it a household pet, constitutes “suffering.”


32 posted on 12/16/2011 8:03:44 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Fawn

Concur. Anyone who can’t enjoy animals is missing an ingredient.


84 posted on 12/16/2011 10:00:32 AM PST by Silentgypsy (If this creature is not stopped it could make its way to Novosibirsk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Fawn

I’ve seen enough responses on this board to know that there IS all too often that political divide when it comes to animals. It’s as if those whose main area of interest is abortion or child abuse or something along those lines cannot handle threads dedicated exclusively to animals and believe that since humans are THE most important thing in their eyes that the flip side is that animals don’t matter at all. They are constantly berating those who love animals that they should NOT care about them to the extent they do — yet clearly they have issues when others respond in kind to them and what they believe to be important. It’s fatiguing at best.


114 posted on 12/16/2011 9:59:27 PM PST by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson