Perry and REAGAN hold the same views. Newt doesn’t that is my point. Notice Reagan made some gaffes but he won by a landslide.
Reagan was to much of a gentlemen to call FDR a liar. Which he was.
After all they did have to fight WWII.
Frankly, Newt has bigger problems than a lie. It’s called Ethics.
I get a little touchy about Reagan. I LUVVVED him.
His ethics problems are the least of his worries. Most of which aren’t true.
Reagan admired and respected FDR even AFTER he became a republican. Perry was behind ACORN at one time. Newt on socialism stated this during a 2001 interview...it is his thoughts on a nanny govt. “NEWT GINGRICH: Start with a notion that they may tell you whether or not you can build a house on your own property, they may tell you whether or not you can own a dog, they may tell you whether or not you can play music above a certain level in the evening, they may tell you whether or not you can drink on Sundays or Saturdays, depending on which state you’re in. If you look at the Taliban, they exercise the right to tell women they can have no job, they can drive no car, and they can get no education beyond sixth grade. That’s a pretty overweening level of power. Inexorably, if you look at the German system or if you look at the more expensive American states — New York would be, probably, the archetype — the more unionized you are and the more bureaucratic you are, the more likely you are to export your young somewhere else to get a better job. You have better growth rates in places that have fewer obstacles to freedom.