Posted on 12/14/2011 2:18:34 PM PST by Syncro
This is not a small-government conservative talking. It is not a conservative at all.
Read the rest at AnnCoulter.Com
so long Ann! we hardly knew you.
Ann Coulter missuses the term Conservative when she calls herself one.
She’s a paid spokesperson for Mitt Romney.
The northeastern tail still trying to wag the American dog. It worked for a long time.
After Gingrich had been speaker for a brief two years, the Republican House voted 395-28 to reprimand him and fine him $300,000 for ethics violations.Which they had no real reason to do.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
The GOP is still kowtowing and giving in to the leftists.
Yep. She calls Romney a conservative.
Ouch..
Ann Coulter, it seems, has become a pro-gay, pro-Romney, anti-freedom systemite.
Too bad. I always thought she was a believer in a God of salvation through Jesus.
Ann Barnhardt in for Ann Coulter, please
If our GOP men lack balls, then step aside for the women
Ann Barnhardt on Romney
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk8O3EPOtT4
The theory then was that when welfare folks move it's probably for better circumstances so they may well no longer qualify.
That's probably still true, plus, as we've had to relearn many times, it may also be part of a welfare scam.
So, just before Welfare Reform was implemented USPS came out with a way to update mailing lists quickly and easily. The program was called MOVE UPDATE.
If a state welfare management team simply ran their address files for welfare recipients through MOVE UPDATE they'd instantly find out how many people should be CUT OFF pending that visit.
I was there when Richmond found that half the welfare recipients in Virginia had an address change order on file.
HALF HALF HALF HALF HALF HALF HALF
Ann is wrong ~ the heart of Welfare Reform was still the old fashioned FDR rule that hadn't been observed in decades. HALF the recipients had moved ~ suggesting fraud.
I would imagine the news was in every State welfare management team's office within the hour.
So, Ann, who do you think you are helping? Really?
If your boy, Mitt, is the nominee, what do we get? Really?
The heartland of America is looking for a fight with Obama, a fight about the direction of the country, and you recommend to us John McCain with hair, movable arms, and a religion so wacky and easily targeted that Obama and his team will not even break a sweat beating him like a drum as he refuses to fight fire with fire. No thanks, Ann. No thanks. I used to be impressed with your logic ... no more.
Had no real reason to do. Man he negotiated it down to that. Wait all the info will be leaked.
Dear Ann,
The year is now 2011 and the election of 2012 requires a knowledgeable leader who’s not afraid to take it to the Marxist and to make certain the election is a referendum about him and his failed policies, and that knowledgeable leader is Newt Gingrich, not your man, Willard Mitt Romney, who would be a career politician but for his loss to Edward Ted Kennedy, back when your man was pro-abortion, remember?
Sincerely,
onyx
And to think I admired this womyn once.
Ann, please be quiet and learn to make cookies.
Good bye, see ya, wouldn’t wanna be ya.
Can you say ANYTHING good about the person YOU support? (I mean other than that he presumably doesn't beat his wife.)
ML/NJ
If you want a clue as towhere this attack is coming from, look at the title of her article “Bombastically,” where else have we just recently heard that word? Maybe like from Romney himself? Yesterday in his attack against Newt?
I think the new rule is that we never post her picture.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.